IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: VPMS Requirements as WG Doc?

"HENDERICKX Wim" <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.be> Fri, 21 November 2008 15:59 UTC

Return-Path: <l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: l2vpn-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-l2vpn-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AA0C3A696B; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 07:59:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: l2vpn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA2BB3A696B for <l2vpn@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 07:59:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ADdv3n0Xq8wm for <l2vpn@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 07:59:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smail5.alcatel.fr (smail5.alcatel.fr [62.23.212.27]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF8893A693E for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 07:58:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from FRVELSBHS03.ad2.ad.alcatel.com ([155.132.6.75]) by smail5.alcatel.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/ICT) with ESMTP id mALFwWbq023501; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:58:32 +0100
Received: from FRVELSMBS22.ad2.ad.alcatel.com ([155.132.6.56]) by FRVELSBHS03.ad2.ad.alcatel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2499); Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:58:32 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: VPMS Requirements as WG Doc?
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:58:30 +0100
Message-ID: <B128F666D4C8BD4FBF56CEAFB2DB66D703BC5A0D@FRVELSMBS22.ad2.ad.alcatel.com>
In-Reply-To: <7A9FC542-B4CA-4A1F-BA93-FACA734C3BB3@castlepoint.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: VPMS Requirements as WG Doc?
Thread-Index: AclLfe0QihRBzq4YTHKl+WUHd50lXQAdA/qA
References: <D8D349FE-F57C-40BE-A888-D6BE4C9C111C@castlepoint.net> <7A9FC542-B4CA-4A1F-BA93-FACA734C3BB3@castlepoint.net>
From: HENDERICKX Wim <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.be>
To: Shane Amante <shane@castlepoint.net>, l2vpn@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Nov 2008 15:58:32.0362 (UTC) FILETIME=[00C180A0:01C94BF2]
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 155.132.188.13
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/l2vpn>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org

support 

-----Original Message-----
From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Shane Amante
Sent: vrijdag 21 november 2008 3:07
To: l2vpn@ietf.org
Subject: Re: VPMS Requirements as WG Doc?

Sorry for the rely to self, but one additional thing.

Please express your opinion by December 12, 2008, at which time we'll
gauge the consensus of the WG mailing list and have identified
volunteers to provide reviews.

Thanks,

-shane


On Nov 20, 2008, at 6:41 PM, Shane Amante wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> At this morning's L2VPN WG meeting, Yuji presented the latest updates 
> and changes on the VPMS requirements draft:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kamite-l2vpn-vpms-frmwk-requirements-
> 02
>
> We would now like to poll the WG mailing list and ask two questions:
> 1)  Is there support for making this a WG document?
> 2)  Are there WG members who support making this a WG document that 
> will volunteer to be reviewers as the doc progresses through WG 
> reviews, WG Last Call, etc.?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -shane & Vach

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email