IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: VPMS Requirements as WG Doc?

Laurent Ciavaglia <Laurent.Ciavaglia@alcatel-lucent.fr> Mon, 24 November 2008 12:48 UTC

Return-Path: <l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: l2vpn-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-l2vpn-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D95463A68CF; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 04:48:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: l2vpn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6063B3A688E for <l2vpn@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 04:48:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3IZ0qJMk40GJ for <l2vpn@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 04:48:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smail6.alcatel.fr (colt-na5.alcatel.fr [62.23.212.5]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43E0A3A683A for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 04:48:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from FRVELSBHS02.ad2.ad.alcatel.com ([155.132.6.74]) by smail6.alcatel.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/ICT) with ESMTP id mAOCmMTb028551 for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:48:22 +0100
Received: from [159.217.32.28] ([159.217.32.28]) by FRVELSBHS02.ad2.ad.alcatel.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2499); Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:48:22 +0100
Message-ID: <492AA290.8050809@alcatel-lucent.fr>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:48:16 +0100
From: Laurent Ciavaglia <Laurent.Ciavaglia@alcatel-lucent.fr>
Organization: Alcatel-Lucent France
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: l2vpn@ietf.org
Subject: Re: VPMS Requirements as WG Doc?
References: <D8D349FE-F57C-40BE-A888-D6BE4C9C111C@castlepoint.net>
In-Reply-To: <D8D349FE-F57C-40BE-A888-D6BE4C9C111C@castlepoint.net>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------000702080405000203050609"
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Nov 2008 12:48:22.0684 (UTC) FILETIME=[EF4C0DC0:01C94E32]
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 155.132.188.84
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/l2vpn>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org

Support.

Laurent.

Shane Amante wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> At this morning's L2VPN WG meeting, Yuji presented the latest updates 
> and changes on the VPMS requirements draft:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kamite-l2vpn-vpms-frmwk-requirements-02
>
> We would now like to poll the WG mailing list and ask two questions:
> 1)  Is there support for making this a WG document?
> 2)  Are there WG members who support making this a WG document that 
> will volunteer to be reviewers as the doc progresses through WG 
> reviews, WG Last Call, etc.?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -shane & Vach
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email