IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: VPMS Requirements as WG Doc?

"Shah, Himanshu" <hshah@ciena.com> Mon, 24 November 2008 14:47 UTC

Return-Path: <l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: l2vpn-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-l2vpn-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC96B3A68DF; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 06:47:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: l2vpn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E80CF3A68DF for <l2vpn@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 06:47:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id idj-Pvinbly4 for <l2vpn@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 06:47:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ripley.ciena.com (ripley.ciena.com [63.118.34.24]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E41E3A68C8 for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 06:47:17 -0800 (PST)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.4325
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: VPMS Requirements as WG Doc?
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 09:47:44 -0500
Message-ID: <6535C9CED6F87446B41D20EF170F23621BD55C@mamxm01.ciena.com>
In-Reply-To: <7A9FC542-B4CA-4A1F-BA93-FACA734C3BB3@castlepoint.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: VPMS Requirements as WG Doc?
Importance: normal
Priority: normal
Thread-Index: AclMB6xyANPqhPtsQZyqXzjP4rTwlQCO7JFA
References: <D8D349FE-F57C-40BE-A888-D6BE4C9C111C@castlepoint.net> <7A9FC542-B4CA-4A1F-BA93-FACA734C3BB3@castlepoint.net>
From: "Shah, Himanshu" <hshah@ciena.com>
To: Shane Amante <shane@castlepoint.net>, l2vpn@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Nov 2008 14:47:46.0744 (UTC) FILETIME=[9D68DB80:01C94E43]
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/l2vpn>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org

1) Support
2) I can help reviewing the doc, time permitting..

/himanshu 



-----Original Message-----
From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Shane Amante
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 9:07 PM
To: l2vpn@ietf.org
Subject: Re: VPMS Requirements as WG Doc?

Sorry for the rely to self, but one additional thing.

Please express your opinion by December 12, 2008, at which time we'll
gauge the consensus of the WG mailing list and have identified
volunteers to provide reviews.

Thanks,

-shane


On Nov 20, 2008, at 6:41 PM, Shane Amante wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> At this morning's L2VPN WG meeting, Yuji presented the latest updates 
> and changes on the VPMS requirements draft:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kamite-l2vpn-vpms-frmwk-requirements-
> 02
>
> We would now like to poll the WG mailing list and ask two questions:
> 1)  Is there support for making this a WG document?
> 2)  Are there WG members who support making this a WG document that 
> will volunteer to be reviewers as the doc progresses through WG 
> reviews, WG Last Call, etc.?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -shane & Vach

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email