IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [L3sm] Poll for adoption of draft-ltsd-l3sm-l3vpn-service-model

<daniel@olddog.co.uk> Tue, 16 June 2015 13:53 UTC

Return-Path: <dk@danielking.net>
X-Original-To: l3sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l3sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDE5A1B3636 for <l3sm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 06:53:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_12=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m0wDhw8WC7jU for <l3sm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 06:53:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-f43.google.com (mail-wg0-f43.google.com [74.125.82.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 794D11B351E for <l3sm@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 06:52:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wgbhy7 with SMTP id hy7so12838169wgb.2 for <l3sm@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 06:52:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject :date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:thread-index :content-language; bh=EfueCfa6XtESK4AGc2MhaS4QSJQ/NxBDaIGkZiTKEDo=; b=KjuRNl/VmWM8mTTPhTlehYKJppL1F9ib4lLcklhQ7pCmOiBUa+XHwVjGUlhVmED808 TKp5+BR3OlbYT50eicNaDT9CPX/Hs6VTjIgF/FT5AB0Zl8jGkiz/FTPZAMoPkiNAur95 bjazboHoQh7D/G4fBoqRurK8LVqsgBH5JC2JNWiBvoR1ImSriBPGG28ZSZIZnko3nGiN eMq3tiK/QnF5N4/LHu3m2vk7u4s1hO1CVyvgKPQiAlv9bWMKbrZJUv//9Y5FIBwk7j0v IrUI8QUCWM3sNwr/YGwi+gZhzS5hZWDKjcEeB7fcK+3M+mUoN7X/W0euDLpfIFx/JlU1 Qs6g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmslM9XAWiB0+7OPJpNAwq7mn5VJH8nC7evoEYN4um8OT5mGZRZucIjlkJ0viohewFKa2Vp
X-Received: by 10.180.79.73 with SMTP id h9mr43429876wix.35.1434462765121; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 06:52:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Mal ([31.6.21.115]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id m10sm2673603wib.17.2015.06.16.06.52.31 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 16 Jun 2015 06:52:43 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Daniel King <dk@danielking.net>
X-Google-Original-Sender: "Daniel King" <dk@danielking.net>
From: daniel@olddog.co.uk
To: 'Qin Wu' <bill.wu@huawei.com>, l3sm@ietf.org
References: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA8475E8DC@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA8475E8DC@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 14:52:18 +0100
Message-ID: <002201d0a83b$b69fd7d0$23df8770$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0023_01D0A844.18655140"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0
Thread-Index: AQGG/sl3YvgUtTlo4ITB0vgKmaiJOJ5CdriA
Content-Language: en-gb
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l3sm/ZVuNEUfA2BTbFIrB5alTzXpUYbw>
Cc: adrian@olddog.co.uk
Subject: Re: [L3sm] Poll for adoption of draft-ltsd-l3sm-l3vpn-service-model
X-BeenThere: l3sm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: L3VPN Service YANG Model discussion group <l3sm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l3sm>, <mailto:l3sm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l3sm/>
List-Post: <mailto:l3sm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l3sm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l3sm>, <mailto:l3sm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 13:53:23 -0000

Hi Chairs, all. 

 

>Poll 

 

Yes, I support adoption of the document. 

 

> have you read the document? 

 

Yes. 

 

> do you think it meets our needs? 

 

Yes, it meets the objectives of the WG identified in the Charter. 

 

> is it stable enough for adoption? 

 

It is a sufficient quality that the intention is clear and I do not see
significant instability or increase in scope . 

 

> If you oppose to adoption, can you say why? 

 

No opposition. 

 

BR, Dan. 

 

From: L3sm [mailto:l3sm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Qin Wu
Sent: 16 June 2015 14:39
To: l3sm@ietf.org
Cc: adrian@olddog.co.uk
Subject: [L3sm] Poll for adoption of draft-ltsd-l3sm-l3vpn-service-model

 

Hello working group:

 

As you'll recall, our charter directs us to produce a single deliverable: a
YANG data model that describes a L3VPN service. 

 

The charter says:

> The working group should consider draft-l3vpn-service-yang as a 

> starting point.

 

The authors of that draft have just reposted it as
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ltsd-l3sm-l3vpn-service-model giving
it a name that associates it with the working group, and picking up a number
of review comments from the mailing list.

 

Obviously the document is not perfect yet, but the chairs believe it is
sufficiently stable that we should adopt it into the WG so that we can
polish it and work towards publication as an RFC. So this email starts a
two-week poll for adoption of the draft ending 30/06/2015.

 

Please indicate whether you support adoption for not, and if not why. If you
support adoption, have you read the document? do you think it meets our
needs? is it stable enough for adoption? If you oppose to adoption, can you
say why? what is your proposed alternative? what needs to be done before
adoption?

 

It's likely that as you review the document you will come up with issues and
concerns. We hope these will be fixed along the way, so please do raise them
on the mailing list. But please also try to understand the difference
between a critical issue that should block adoption, and smaller issues that
can be fixed better through discussion within the working group.

 

Thanks,

Qin and Adrian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email