Re: [L3sm] Poll for adoption of draft-ltsd-l3sm-l3vpn-service-model

[wangzitao <[e-mail]>]

Hi Chairs and all:

I have read this draft. The quality of document is good. And I think it meets our needs and is worth for standardization.
Therefore I support adoption.

Best regards!
-Michael
发件人: L3sm [mailto:[e-mail]] 代表 Qin Wu
发送时间: 2015年6月16日 21:39
收件人: [e-mail]
抄送: [e-mail]
主题: [L3sm] Poll for adoption of draft-ltsd-l3sm-l3vpn-service-model


Hello working group:



As you'll recall, our charter directs us to produce a single deliverable: a YANG data model that describes a L3VPN service.



The charter says:

> The working group should consider draft-l3vpn-service-yang as a

> starting point.



The authors of that draft have just reposted it as https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ltsd-l3sm-l3vpn-service-model giving it a name that associates it with the working group, and picking up a number of review comments from the mailing list.



Obviously the document is not perfect yet, but the chairs believe it is sufficiently stable that we should adopt it into the WG so that we can polish it and work towards publication as an RFC. So this email starts a two-week poll for adoption of the draft ending 30/06/2015.



Please indicate whether you support adoption for not, and if not why. If you support adoption, have you read the document? do you think it meets our needs? is it stable enough for adoption? If you oppose to adoption, can you say why? what is your proposed alternative? what needs to be done before adoption?



It's likely that as you review the document you will come up with issues and concerns. We hope these will be fixed along the way, so please do raise them on the mailing list. But please also try to understand the difference between a critical issue that should block adoption, and smaller issues that can be fixed better through discussion within the working group.



Thanks,

Qin and Adrian