Re: [L3sm] New Version Notification for draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis-02.txt

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Mon, 21 August 2017 08:39 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: l3sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l3sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1E41132952 for <l3sm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 01:39:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.22
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.22 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NnP3RtG8HUqV for <l3sm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 01:39:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52800132944 for <l3sm@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 01:39:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO LHREML712-CAH.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DTV44593; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 08:39:34 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML412-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.73) by LHREML712-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 09:39:34 +0100
Received: from NKGEML513-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.219]) by nkgeml412-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.73]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 16:39:16 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: David Ball <daviball@cisco.com>, "l3sm@ietf.org" <l3sm@ietf.org>
CC: Stephane Litkowski <stephane.litkowski@orange.com>, Kenichi Ogaki <ke-oogaki@kddi.com>, "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Thread-Topic: [L3sm] New Version Notification for draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis-02.txt
Thread-Index: AQHTEPkPvtKnYeVf5kqBvex8Emv4lqJ70DmggAkEwYCACZi1sIAAIaGQ
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 08:39:15 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9AABA8A4@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9AA5D7A2@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com> <c76328ad-b71e-b2a3-92a4-b02beac2be7d@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.136.79.163]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9AABA8A4nkgeml513mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090205.599A9C47.0037, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.1.219, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: d1f91806db59184c9d27871b742d3605
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l3sm/qRSZUZAna8_rhdKmlPReS5RWLgY>
Subject: Re: [L3sm] New Version Notification for draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis-02.txt
X-BeenThere: l3sm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: L3VPN Service YANG Model discussion group <l3sm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l3sm>, <mailto:l3sm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/l3sm/>
List-Post: <mailto:l3sm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l3sm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l3sm>, <mailto:l3sm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 08:39:41 -0000

> 11. In accordance with the clarified scope, parts of the model that correspond

>       with information provided by the SP need to be marked with "config false".

>       I've identified the following, but there might be more.

>      1. The list of profiles of various types (i.e. l3vpn-service/vpn-profiles)

>      2. For the connection addresses, the provider's IP address/mask:

>     • l3vpn-service/sites/site/site-network-accesses/site-network-access/ip-connection/ipv4/provider-dhcp/provider-address

>     • l3vpn-service/sites/site/site-network-accesses/site-network-access/ip-connection/ipv4/provider-dhcp/mask

>     • l3vpn-service/sites/site/site-network-accesses/site-network-access/ip-connection/ipv4/dhcp-relay/provider-address

>     • l3vpn-service/sites/site/site-network-accesses/site-network-access/ip-connection/ipv4/dhcp-relay/mask

>     • l3vpn-service/sites/site/site-network-accesses/site-network-access/ip-connection/ipv4/addresses/provider-address

>     • l3vpn-service/sites/site/site-network-accesses/site-network-access/ip-connection/ipv4/addresses/mask

>     • l3vpn-service/sites/site/site-network-accesses/site-network-access/ip-connection/ipv6/provider-dhcp/provider-address

>     • l3vpn-service/sites/site/site-network-accesses/site-network-access/ip-connection/ipv6/provider-dhcp/mask

>     • l3vpn-service/sites/site/site-network-accesses/site-network-access/ip-connection/ipv6/dhcp-relay/provider-address

>     • l3vpn-service/sites/site/site-network-accesses/site-network-access/ip-connection/ipv6/dhcp-relay/mask

>     • l3vpn-service/sites/site/site-network-accesses/site-network-access/ip-connection/ipv6/addresses/provider-address

>     • l3vpn-service/sites/site/site-network-accesses/site-network-access/ip-connection/ipv6/addresses/mask



That sounds reasonable.

[Qin]: One more comment, we can not put ‘config false’ for l3vpn-service/vpn-profiles, since Config true leafrefs MUST NOT refer to config false data

This issue was discussed before, see discussion available at:

https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l3sm/current/msg00683.html