Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dots-telemetry-use-cases-12

H Y <yuuhei.hayashi@gmail.com> Sat, 08 October 2022 01:01 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <166492776340.60835.10697691104403592039@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <166492776340.60835.10697691104403592039@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: H Y <yuuhei.hayashi@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2022 10:01:08 +0900
Message-ID: <CAA8pjUNsDH7LjonnoDDa2uLe4R+27_Kn_zjm+qGdN=+L2vDOzA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
Cc: secdir@ietf.org, dots@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dots-telemetry-use-cases.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/qTFpsQ9k6anA27l-3BmaIx81kEo>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dots-telemetry-use-cases-12
Precedence: list

Hi Phillip,

Thank you for your careful review!

Thanks,
Yuhei

2022年10月5日(水) 8:56 Phillip Hallam-Baker via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>:
>
> Reviewer: Phillip Hallam-Baker
> Review result: Ready
>
> The document describes additional telemetry data types for DDoS signaling. As
> such, the document appropriately references the security considerations in the
> base specification, RFC9244.
>
> Given the subject domain is adversarial, constant development of new attack
> presentations is to be expected and thus the need for constant extension of the
> telemetry description.
>
> Where machine-learning techniques are used, it may be useful to provide a label
> to distinguish the techniques in use so that other elements in the system can
> react appropriately when the technique or parameters are changed.
>
>


-- 
----------------------------------
Yuuhei HAYASHI
08065300884
yuuhei.hayashi@gmail.com
iehuuy_0220@docomo.ne.jp
----------------------------------

[Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf… Phillip Hallam-Baker via Datatracker
Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-… H Y