Re: [ledbat] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ledbat-congestion-07.txt

Rolf Winter <Rolf.Winter@neclab.eu> Wed, 20 July 2011 08:23 UTC

Return-Path: <Rolf.Winter@neclab.eu>
X-Original-To: ledbat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ledbat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F0821F8745 for <ledbat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 01:23:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.173
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.173 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.077, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JfzC9z+FWCmm for <ledbat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 01:23:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp0.netlab.nec.de (smtp0.netlab.nec.de [195.37.70.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00EC221F8593 for <ledbat@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 01:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp0.netlab.nec.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0E128000326; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 10:23:51 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (atlas1.office.hd)
Received: from smtp0.netlab.nec.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlas1.office.hd [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VCtTtfnDhROT; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 10:23:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ENCELADUS.office.hd (ENCELADUS.office.hd [192.168.24.52]) by smtp0.netlab.nec.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B6328000198; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 10:23:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from DAPHNIS.office.hd ([169.254.2.188]) by ENCELADUS.office.hd ([192.168.24.52]) with mapi id 14.01.0270.001; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 10:23:31 +0200
From: Rolf Winter <Rolf.Winter@neclab.eu>
To: "janardhan.iyengar@fandm.edu" <janardhan.iyengar@fandm.edu>, "ledbat@ietf.org" <ledbat@ietf.org>, Mirja Kuehlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@ikr.uni-stuttgart.de>, Murari Sridharan <muraris@microsoft.com>
Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ledbat-congestion-07.txt
Thread-Index: AQHMQkWWN90Zt3RWoU+Ah+/lv0LJDpT057nw
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 08:23:30 +0000
Message-ID: <791AD3077F94194BB2BDD13565B6295D1CFE9B50@DAPHNIS.office.hd>
References: <4E1F1D5A.6030704@fandm.edu>
In-Reply-To: <4E1F1D5A.6030704@fandm.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US, de-DE
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.1.6.28]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [ledbat] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ledbat-congestion-07.txt
X-BeenThere: ledbat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of the LEDBAT WG <ledbat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ledbat>, <mailto:ledbat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ledbat>
List-Post: <mailto:ledbat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ledbat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ledbat>, <mailto:ledbat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 08:23:56 -0000

Hello,

could Dario, Bob, Gorry and Arjuna please check whether your comments are resolved. This would help us make progress.

Thanks,


Rolf



NEC Europe Limited | Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL | Registered in England 2832014 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Janardhan Iyengar [mailto:jana.iyengar@gmail.com]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 14. Juli 2011 18:46
> To: ledbat@ietf.org; Mirja Kuehlewind; Murari Sridharan; Rolf Winter
> Subject: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ledbat-
> congestion-07.txt
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> We've posted a new version of the LEDBAT document that addresses all
> issues brought up in WGLC but one.  Besides some nits, the main changes
> are:
> 1. We changed the text in the Fairness section to more accurately
> reflect possible issues with LEDBAT's fairness. (Dario's comments)
> 2. The applicability section now has better articulation about LEDBAT's
> interactions with with ECN and AQM. (Bob's, Gorry's, Arjuna's comments)
> 
> We haven't yet addressed the MIN_CWND issue under extreme congestion;
> we hope to resolve this issue at the IETF.  We are planning to not
> discuss the question of incentivizing ECN within this document.  It
> seems like a question that is worth considering in a broader context
> and needs more discussion;  at this late hour (in/after WGLC), it seems
> like an issue that we may not be able to resolve here.  It can
> certainly be brought to the table if/when LEDBAT goes from experimental
> to standards-track.
> 
> - jana
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ledbat-congestion-
> 07.txt
> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:57:51 -0700
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> To: mirja.kuehlewind@ikr.uni-stuttgart.de
> CC: jiyengar@fandm.edu, mirja.kuehlewind@ikr.uni-stuttgart.de,
> 	greg@bittorrent.com, shalunov@bittorrent.com
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-ledbat-congestion-07.txt has been
> successfully submitted by Mirja Kuehlewind and posted to the IETF
> repository.
> 
> Filename:	 draft-ietf-ledbat-congestion
> Revision:	 07
> Title:		 Low Extra Delay Background Transport (LEDBAT)
> Creation date:	 2011-07-11
> WG ID:		 ledbat
> Number of pages: 18
> 
> Abstract:
>     LEDBAT is an experimental delay-based congestion control algorithm
>     that attempts to utilize the available bandwidth on an end-to-end
>     path while limiting the consequent increase in queueing delay on
> the
>     path.  LEDBAT uses changes in one-way delay measurements to limit
>     congestion that the flow itself induces in the network.  LEDBAT is
>     designed for use by background bulk-transfer applications; it is
>     designed to be no more aggressive than TCP congestion control and
> to
>     yield in the presence of any competing flows when latency builds,
>     thus limiting interference with the network performance of the
>     competing flows.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The IETF Secretariat