Re: [Lime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-11.txt> (Generic YANG Data Model for Connectionless Operations, Administration, and Maintenance(OAM) protocols) to Proposed Standard

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Thu, 19 October 2017 16:12 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 800B713263F; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 09:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3yQLV8GnPxeK; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 09:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x229.google.com (mail-lf0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1704413235C; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 09:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x229.google.com with SMTP id n69so10208711lfn.2; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 09:12:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=EWQgt9/2BxYb8cA29kbwL/Gx4/qGf0zh/lxkMTlKtwM=; b=sdgAyNZ0GREpa1h6qCxJ/JyD+oGJ+OHtjZOf80zWKq5olo2OpOr81wFeLyTQBqD/zU 2ACHaLDb3mMj7ZNOQ6FHU23cdv95NkZIFowMP/ls4/7a8CRlGo8gF6pA1eJdZ78RsKkM G542Q7NpeMWQnm530/R+XRclBz2sEYoQjORYZY4gvOQEtxe+Fn4km5Nd65/8gkH1zAcG JeeCIDncX4HHKepxW0IkwkfuaReJAjNo05XwMO+jU/pUiJYXZ+hk1J29UsLYQluw+wiD MI6tcxg4Oq17BH9Yms01DdDoUWheCVpm8mNckqBGZZW8ZHwTAzXKz8HYLUqisaOI1VYt OO5g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EWQgt9/2BxYb8cA29kbwL/Gx4/qGf0zh/lxkMTlKtwM=; b=qnUPHFcLcu8pKPedX77JZD8CAc+2Q27Hm4MsiubjD884o2LZeAf9XPd/YvES3oq49e BksX2aW85M3FOtwCOwIHkNMwur3lTk9TYGttsnRT53B8Zcm0AWSyDtRcQjrUOtz2oyZi T8tmB/ixUsDyMX/oksouUZaMvaUqHZ31wUyTFUpL4FnrfHT5uMqV3PWS2bbHhLMEOomL fx3pb0RMNypMCX7xjAVYq8fwtHZwlAn91fr1F9q/5oUw5BEXFM66sjQNxDo/bs0PDSkc fet8KmZegDwD9Q2dC2CYclWcxrx93/bF1coChmh0E5pMhM5Wfj0ea256uMdjz9I5EX/X Ru1g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaWJBOeoi3DLt5GaVh+5bokqJhCGfNG/CqKz4pXCOffuKLI9Uq64 eNVw3K8Rsi7xkjsVbSbMgB7zhxwhCXD8P/n0TCL5Lw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+QsMxVdSXyDQgoVJGxYLnqUaG9JS4dxzu0wQ/hVh41YNJ8pqn/rT2Zeh6qRPO/SzQal2mW59JUxs6hReDGcRi0=
X-Received: by 10.46.87.88 with SMTP id r24mr1050071ljd.155.1508429522129; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 09:12:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.46.32.147 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 09:12:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <B3116111-2D73-44AD-ABE1-5BE7A146C554@cisco.com>
References: <150772925005.24695.3851410645764765123.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CA+RyBmVq9MnC97LuVRzhYiR+_dj0gQ2YRSp+b-223fjQXvhR_w@mail.gmail.com> <B3116111-2D73-44AD-ABE1-5BE7A146C554@cisco.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 09:12:01 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmU5VtW0cngqCfSbTTz_-2o=RKOTncKKXxZnROXtOCVsKA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam@ietf.org>, "Ronald P. Bonica" <rbonica@juniper.net>, "lime-chairs@ietf.org" <lime-chairs@ietf.org>, "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com>, "lime@ietf.org" <lime@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045f8438d5d802055be89dc2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lime/PorBlQpvGriQc1qnAbGJ5FrIteA>
Subject: Re: [Lime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-11.txt> (Generic YANG Data Model for Connectionless Operations, Administration, and Maintenance(OAM) protocols) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: lime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Layer Independent OAM Management in Multi-Layer Environment \(LIME\) discussion list." <lime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lime/>
List-Post: <mailto:lime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 16:12:06 -0000

Dear Carlos, et.al,
I sincerely apologize for sending the empty message. I am working on the
substantive comments to both documents that are in the IETF LC at the
moment and will share them with all by Monday, October 23rd.

Regards,
Greg

On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) <
cpignata@cisco.com> wrote:

> Dear Greg,
>
> The LIME WG and draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam editors have been
> considering all your comments, and will continue to do so.
>
> For clarity, however, what are you referring to on this one-liner?
>
> —
> Carlos Pignataro, carlos@cisco.com
>
> *“Sometimes I use big words that I do not fully understand, to make myself
> sound more photosynthesis."*
>
> On Oct 19, 2017, at 4:24 AM, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear All,
> please kindly consider my comments on draft-ietf-lime-yang-
> connectionless-oam
>
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 6:40 AM, The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> The IESG has received a request from the Layer Independent OAM Management
>> in
>> the Multi-Layer Environment WG (lime) to consider the following document:
>> -
>> 'Generic YANG Data Model for Connectionless Operations, Administration,
>>    and Maintenance(OAM) protocols'
>>   <draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-11.txt> as Proposed Standard
>>
>> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
>> final
>> comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
>> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2017-10-25. Exceptionally, comments may be
>> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
>> beginning of
>> the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>>
>> Abstract
>>
>>
>>    This document presents a base YANG Data model for connectionless
>>    Operations Administration, and Maintenance(OAM) protocols.  It
>>    provides a technology-independent abstraction of key OAM constructs
>>    for connectionless protocols.  The base model presented here can be
>>    extended to include technology specific details.  This is leading to
>>    uniformity between OAM protocols and support both nested OAM
>>    workflows (i.e., performing OAM functions at different or same levels
>>    through a unified interface) and interacting OAM workflows ( i.e.,
>>    performing OAM functions at same levels through a unified interface).
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The file can be obtained via
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam/
>>
>> IESG discussion can be tracked via
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lime-yang-connec
>> tionless-oam/ballot/
>>
>>
>> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lime mailing list
>> Lime@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime
>>
>
>
>