Re: [Lime] Progress on LIME Connectionless documents

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Wed, 28 June 2017 20:47 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AADE12EB15 for <lime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 13:47:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BE_c0YRZGhi6 for <lime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 13:47:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x236.google.com (mail-pg0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4098F1270AC for <lime@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 13:47:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x236.google.com with SMTP id u62so37146140pgb.3 for <lime@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 13:47:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=QrMV8mfFDOOepQbNWeyzY9E1TEwIpmyAlmT5YKXmzMo=; b=RQ5EQ+LPnXYfPlAYTQH+ChpBiUqVLI7Z3U8QpyixS3RksNOZ6cmHXY8Sp086uWfkFa Wrrh6pLKbmZ7jM29W4CQF8RkBceKhfFaFMbeyzY42PVZ7Mb/gWFW9BHoUInCvCU5KQpp 0lxHvS1F76HCzZpKC+DStbdHc/mWVWaQU+Gst0VKQ2f1/R34A6Bf5W8AySrv/H/9NY+M sXHNsdVbvgs2BnYDlWRdgwEhTlT1STk/vXrY341NyfAlubeowAtAA6WuVsazPq/ega7f 7QNDKkERZXbSirB+3xytdr+OFUYdGyh+pmh1H1deqvrAPtyfeNxQWNHQ/fEI2mhAokPY ZVTg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=QrMV8mfFDOOepQbNWeyzY9E1TEwIpmyAlmT5YKXmzMo=; b=O5LV5gi8kxL4UTH6g6WLpuaKD0PxhHAavD3L3XRNS2RITpHW7SA+jvRWdkek2vbzeY wxFxbYvuReTpGPkpo0HqhRvknTqq8Sz7iNrAeZF8QQODude3rnH71eHVfdWx2/6wjVav uApSZvJj2Bl6anH15Fbchv+C5X3KyIEfzT7Q1eD+615y/akuM7wa2q4vVvwjL1h/ByRB 2hZ6MrdXtg0V9QDkBdxPeqxhGBchfiX375suR2883o9TC6TPq0dmUzxgUKTtjVKESa31 HhkBjO4aANqq3mlourBgKDwy+K9q735zOCbI5gNSuxlmpLVnIW/41RC8LcXJYxTZGgFu 8Lbw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOzWETGIPKq3BW53YkpNL8aCYzLyyflg+vtZuavF2VuebikrCD6s lTEnzETGaH1pDxhrWyvj3EyahI6UWQ==
X-Received: by 10.99.121.75 with SMTP id u72mr9964913pgc.53.1498682832834; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 13:47:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.163.236 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 13:47:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.100.163.236 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 13:47:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <29E5AA02-4CC5-4CA9-A967-A9355EBD9175@cisco.com>
References: <29E5AA02-4CC5-4CA9-A967-A9355EBD9175@cisco.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 13:47:12 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmXRaE3-nRbvzOAUqio7LFbzav6z5WDwLs07MOnFXiPMOg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
Cc: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, lime@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c03ef00e1d7ad05530b4950"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lime/mxhWWvOUh3t_RGV-y4jx9SYBWQ4>
Subject: Re: [Lime] Progress on LIME Connectionless documents
X-BeenThere: lime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Layer Independent OAM Management in Multi-Layer Environment \(LIME\) discussion list." <lime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lime/>
List-Post: <mailto:lime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 20:47:15 -0000

Hi Carlos and Ron,
thank you for the update on these drafts. I haven't seen IPR poll, WGLC on
any of these. Have I missed them? I do have comments I'd like to share. Or
should I wait for the IETF LC?

Regards, Greg

On Jun 28, 2017 1:27 PM, "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>;
wrote:

> Dear WG,
>
> We will be progressing the LIME Connectionless documents, submitting them
> to our AD.
>
> Please see the respective write-ups at:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam/
> shepherdwriteup/
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lime-yang-
> connectionless-oam-methods/shepherdwriteup/
>
> Thanks,
>
> Carlos & Ron.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lime mailing list
> Lime@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime
>
>