IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] Short name for DFZ?

Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com> Mon, 21 October 2013 21:59 UTC

Return-Path: <scott.brim@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56CBB11E862E for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 14:59:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.469
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.469 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.129, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Z=0.259, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tCR2NH4xy6N0 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 14:59:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-x234.google.com (mail-oa0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F76A11E8291 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 14:59:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id n10so3637999oag.11 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 14:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ZtRrnzZIL47+tU7TFaxF2xfwrVy/fzKNrwuYbwLr3bI=; b=vBxDiLaWGT9jRPbKH+3rdvy7xFSSfvqIK9vX9eJaKuMWjbT7asGVJ1SL3NdIcK/P2b UmBkctcIJT1E5nVgKTf1dBR8fjW4dHJ4rgWxISbNdCnubV1mzeZ6Yk+AeRA0LKlqwe8p dqZMWvusXP51N6UM59GJ08RYQHDJUxFBYlYyrXMzbqFC7NXFxfYDbLRISzuNpAVj+WdV lD1P9/1UomjwreFPoUkA9pdYP4YLZLCiOLsVcWqSEf9i+UKAh6F4rl1T92JBh2cZeKa5 0XG4hNAVKresQhClWVhvKMjqiV+ejJbxUS/Bkw3U51mi36cDyg36J6VlYLZBTSAeQD9o FRgw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.215.202 with SMTP id ok10mr3923837obc.62.1382392764438; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 14:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.2.134 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 14:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.2.134 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 14:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20131021191848.432A418C15B@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
References: <20131021191848.432A418C15B@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 17:59:24 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPv4CP8eJ4JCAW5O0tpgwJpMxPodg=-7ZEh7S8d4BUmqQNfwwQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
To: Noel Chiappa <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c24a52aa20a304e9476556"
Cc: lisp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [lisp] Short name for DFZ?
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 21:59:28 -0000

How serious was the "request"? The DFZ != "core".  I would just clearly
define it and use the acronym.
On Oct 21, 2013 3:20 PM, "Noel Chiappa" <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> wrote:

> Hi, I was asked to kill all uses of the term "DFZ" in the Intro document,
> and
> was advised to replace it with the term "Internet core". However, DFZ is
> used
> a _lot_, and having "Internet core" really gets clunky after about the 67th
> time. Anyone got a suggestion for a shorter acronym, etc, if "DFZ" is
> deemed
> unacceptable?
>
>         Noel
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email