Re: [lisp] Short name for DFZ?
Roger Jørgensen <rogerj@gmail.com> Tue, 22 October 2013 08:26 UTC
Return-Path: <rogerj@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9D7911E8184 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 01:26:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.171
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.171 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.130, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Z=0.259]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6gjtwCngPDGb for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 01:26:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x22c.google.com (mail-we0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46FA311E8356 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 01:26:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id q58so7614541wes.17 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 01:26:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=vUrXM42ZpgYk5Z/jxwQqxOIaGzjXXyBHYdgU98fQOV4=; b=1BsLFnbsJAlzlxJjMnY0G+Zkq5xertUzO31qpe7OabMpBXy+ujS8SS527yo7wRIr4R fWef/lCZwQqeBHZqhS2gMmNzGQwy6+PUvOp21amZ1cs0pgm3RwquIMdJoUr16BGp3Xuw 4hHchZiWVbhe3PBxcxE4qljdH1cyN643uPysd8QmitLjYWg9aDCjqCP7H75KvZcqyQR8 HQL4Nmmo+/OdcjyIYZ5SICFDZo+ACVsSebmbdiVFbpo/oLWMGJqAApbImxzyWAg7f6MM toG5nHih+liHUoJcPJdqkRaBgYraVv5rDAP02F3KxzIB8hwpsy+NaNDyd6UFIyu2kdmQ iSHg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.149.179 with SMTP id ub19mr13133322wib.43.1382430376487; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 01:26:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.213.72 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 01:26:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20131021191848.432A418C15B@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
References: <20131021191848.432A418C15B@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 10:26:16 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKFn1SEvEKHP0GV3PqFXcuTSruSNvjFXNNK8ySxrSe-FkCwNLg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roger Jørgensen <rogerj@gmail.com>
To: Noel Chiappa <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Short name for DFZ?
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 08:26:19 -0000
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Noel Chiappa <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> wrote: > Hi, I was asked to kill all uses of the term "DFZ" in the Intro document, and > was advised to replace it with the term "Internet core". However, DFZ is used > a _lot_, and having "Internet core" really gets clunky after about the 67th > time. Anyone got a suggestion for a shorter acronym, etc, if "DFZ" is deemed > unacceptable? I would say define the term DFZ and add some context to it, like it's the "legacy" Internet or our current Internet. And then continue to use it. It is the most used understanding of the "core" of Internet. Even not technical people mostly get it. -- Roger Jorgensen | ROJO9-RIPE rogerj@gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | roger@jorgensen.no
- [lisp] Short name for DFZ? Noel Chiappa
- Re: [lisp] Short name for DFZ? Sharon Barkai
- Re: [lisp] Short name for DFZ? Bill Chastain
- Re: [lisp] Short name for DFZ? Scott Brim
- Re: [lisp] Short name for DFZ? Roger Jørgensen
- Re: [lisp] Short name for DFZ? Noel Chiappa