[lisp] Short name for DFZ?

jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) Mon, 21 October 2013 19:18 UTC

Return-Path: <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0D7E11E8647 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:18:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.412
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.412 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.072, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Z=0.259]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pAfoWPMNninK for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:18:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.lcs.mit.edu (mercury.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.122]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E035A11E858D for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:18:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11178) id 432A418C15B; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 15:18:48 -0400 (EDT)
To: lisp@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20131021191848.432A418C15B@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 15:18:48 -0400
From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: [lisp] Short name for DFZ?
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 19:18:57 -0000

Hi, I was asked to kill all uses of the term "DFZ" in the Intro document, and
was advised to replace it with the term "Internet core". However, DFZ is used
a _lot_, and having "Internet core" really gets clunky after about the 67th
time. Anyone got a suggestion for a shorter acronym, etc, if "DFZ" is deemed
unacceptable?

	Noel