IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] 6830bis Review

"Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com> Mon, 15 January 2018 19:57 UTC

Return-Path: <rrahman@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56ED312EBB9 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 11:57:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.53
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.53 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z7rhR2aq8_PW for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 11:57:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BC1D12EBDC for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 11:57:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2492; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1516046262; x=1517255862; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=gJN8Mqx6ldyxZRTl67lh8f+cuzS451Jkr9QxWdQkIJo=; b=ECHv46hG4aUMHw2sT4ts15QYoi4oUFt2fe3LOBxc+RV3tcc9zVoKUEfj tBsKJV5wwggICclAQFpqJiIh7r9flr+vnwzoNrzfyAFmLp49A2FVPHAPi 8cDNzwDfUc+tg/f9lEtaFK1bkU5qx9wZmw0lj56Gz2R/Rum4sCPXCueDx k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BZAQCFBl1a/4oNJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYNBZnQnB4QMiiSOX4FbJ4kGjiaCFgoYC4UYAhqENz8YAQEBAQEBAQEBayiFIwEBAQMBAQEhEToLEAIBCBgCAiYCAgIfBgsVEAIEAQ0FihsDDQgQqQOCJ4c4DYIEAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGAWBD4VCgVeBaSkMgnmCa0QBAQIBggWDADGCNAWjJz0CiAqIPYUClBCNPkCIegIRGQGBOwEfOYFQbxU9KgGBf4RXeIt1AYEWAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,365,1511827200"; d="scan'208";a="56964168"
Received: from alln-core-5.cisco.com ([173.36.13.138]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Jan 2018 19:57:41 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (xch-aln-002.cisco.com [173.36.7.12]) by alln-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w0FJvfoG008990 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 15 Jan 2018 19:57:41 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 13:57:40 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-005.cisco.com ([173.37.102.15]) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com ([173.37.102.15]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 13:57:40 -0600
From: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com>
To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal <rodrigueznatal@gmail.com>
CC: "lisp@ietf.org list" <lisp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [lisp] 6830bis Review
Thread-Index: AQHTdYn4waOx1EJhKUiOK6AT86ziIKNW4xgAgBToqRuAAJOugIABDoqAgAB73wCAAV6gAIAAOj8AgAEgNQCAAG7tgIAENQ0AgACGtQCAAApagIAACpaAgAANLQA=
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 19:57:40 +0000
Message-ID: <C34FFF1A-2994-4DE9-A24C-F65219E495B7@cisco.com>
References: <907CD955-B043-4728-ABD6-5AD96192EC5F@inria.fr> <4EAD1E98-E8E7-4A0A-8300-2D185B9109CC@gigix.net> <CAGE_QexqW=q51kXR9fo_8YDu6VVUHCBz-XrGt5iZ6FOTRxDLiA@mail.gmail.com> <49EE7D2D-FC59-42F1-A93A-B315D4D6420E@gigix.net> <98C25E20-BD78-462A-BDB4-572AA24C1A97@gigix.net> <829870A2-2D90-4967-983A-56F62E765796@gmail.com> <5754BC06-9CBD-4C52-9CD6-402610EAABF1@gigix.net> <DA85FB85-45B8-4BF8-B5BC-F544E11AB90A@gmail.com> <CA+YHcKHxEJjFqm4z-PCo4LN_gv7v=mqQ7R47qPepLHJQ+kp=7w@mail.gmail.com> <F1137329-DA1F-4E50-9B94-386AC0B2B62B@gmail.com> <0F4F11DF-07B6-407D-BE5F-BBF1777D1CF2@gigix.net> <232ACD23-F1E0-49B0-983F-D17F773A99CA@gmail.com> <2241290D-29C3-4ACB-9726-ACC6DD42E8CE@gigix.net> <29E4D891-E429-4A71-BFC3-276F730EA5C6@gmail.com> <CA+YHcKHEvE=CJZUYEUm9dm53oVnj8g7JNbrMdGkEu=mcRSBCQg@mail.gmail.com> <E625760A-292B-439A-BAEC-49BEDDBEF688@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <E625760A-292B-439A-BAEC-49BEDDBEF688@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.27.0.171010
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [161.44.212.114]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <B2894505C8EC2D4EBF212EE8D0D7D26D@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/8Qhj30_CSUdarw5LxyDreiBHxt4>
Subject: Re: [lisp] 6830bis Review
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 19:57:48 -0000

I also believe SMRs should be in the CP doc. I would support Dino’s  proposal below.

Regards,
Reshad.

On 2018-01-15, 2:10 PM, "lisp on behalf of Dino Farinacci" <lisp-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of farinacci@gmail.com> wrote:

    I’d be willing to make a deal.
    
    SMRs go to 6833bis and RLOC-probes stay in 6830bis. Since RLOC-probes are connected (semantically) to echo-noncing which use bits in the LISP header.
    
    Dino
    
    > On Jan 15, 2018, at 10:32 AM, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal <rodrigueznatal@gmail.com> wrote:
    > 
    > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 6:55 PM, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> wrote:
    >>> SMRs and RLOC-probes are control-plane features used by xTRs to be able to run the data-plane.
    >> 
    >> They are data-plane features that use control-plane messages. No other devices sends an RLOC-probe (or SMR) then an xTR.
    > 
    > IMHO I think that the SMR should go into the control-plane document. I
    > believe that there are many cases (specially from an SDN point of
    > view) where you may want to send SMRs from entities other than xTRs.
    > 
    > There's already a draft [1] that proposes that SMRs can also be sent
    > by MSMRs. That draft is documenting what has been implemented and
    > running on OpenDaylight for a while now.
    > 
    > Furthermore, lig-lispmob [2] supports sending SMRs on demand through a
    > CLI without running an xTR. I've found that capability useful on many
    > occasions.
    > 
    > Alberto
    > 
    > [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-ms-smr-04
    > [2] https://github.com/LISPmob/lig-lispmob
    
    _______________________________________________
    lisp mailing list
    lisp@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email