IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] 6830bis Review

"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Mon, 15 January 2018 18:18 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12B1612EAF3 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 10:18:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.721
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.721 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3QfU6PDSf997 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 10:18:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailb2.tigertech.net (mailb2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.154]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56BBD12EADC for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 10:18:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 449CF523284; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 10:18:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=1.tigertech; t=1516040304; bh=Ubhv9ffnXPt6+0cJ8BAwq16ojeNo7hNIxLbEe3hkPSA=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=fXs8VZ9BZ7Nn84CAysGUTMwibXyRBhipMViGdFemqdGjFPP5OIlHFIjOSvsejellM nWZYVUECRkszpywTMb/vJHdhIbDNiNrG/WHd9FslhZ2ORHKmGRuXlWWUTtzXNJ2Yps fHFfKJz0vXnKFUV4xYlGCDPWaD/k9TghJCB5Qcm0=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at b2.tigertech.net
Received: from Joels-MacBook-Pro.local (unknown [50.225.209.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9512B1C0213; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 10:18:23 -0800 (PST)
To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
Cc: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, "lisp@ietf.org list" <lisp@ietf.org>, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal <rodrigueznatal@gmail.com>
References: <907CD955-B043-4728-ABD6-5AD96192EC5F@inria.fr> <4EAD1E98-E8E7-4A0A-8300-2D185B9109CC@gigix.net> <CAGE_QexqW=q51kXR9fo_8YDu6VVUHCBz-XrGt5iZ6FOTRxDLiA@mail.gmail.com> <49EE7D2D-FC59-42F1-A93A-B315D4D6420E@gigix.net> <98C25E20-BD78-462A-BDB4-572AA24C1A97@gigix.net> <829870A2-2D90-4967-983A-56F62E765796@gmail.com> <5754BC06-9CBD-4C52-9CD6-402610EAABF1@gigix.net> <DA85FB85-45B8-4BF8-B5BC-F544E11AB90A@gmail.com> <CA+YHcKHxEJjFqm4z-PCo4LN_gv7v=mqQ7R47qPepLHJQ+kp=7w@mail.gmail.com> <F1137329-DA1F-4E50-9B94-386AC0B2B62B@gmail.com> <0F4F11DF-07B6-407D-BE5F-BBF1777D1CF2@gigix.net> <232ACD23-F1E0-49B0-983F-D17F773A99CA@gmail.com> <2241290D-29C3-4ACB-9726-ACC6DD42E8CE@gigix.net> <29E4D891-E429-4A71-BFC3-276F730EA5C6@gmail.com> <80b1523a-9396-ba8c-83b0-83812984bd1f@joelhalpern.com> <9097FAFF-2D3D-4220-9F25-73D792A28EB5@gmail.com>
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Message-ID: <52222fd9-b63c-72d8-d584-ea2588a9d522@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 13:18:22 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9097FAFF-2D3D-4220-9F25-73D792A28EB5@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/9hIhbwNrlAHCIgUHeOf8TvH8QMA>
Subject: Re: [lisp] 6830bis Review
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 18:18:32 -0000

If there is silence, the chairs will make their best judgment on behalf 
of the working group.  That is our job.

The other choice is that we block the document until there are enough 
voices.  I would prefer not to do that.

Yours,
Joel

On 1/15/18 1:16 PM, Dino Farinacci wrote:
>> <chair hat on>  (Yes, my hats are bouncing.)
>> I would really like to hear from other WG members about this.  It is the WGs document.  The chairs would prefer not to simply use their own judgment.  So to repeat Luigi's plea: speak up.
>> </chair hat on>
> 
> And if there is silence, then what?
> 
> Dino
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email