IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] 6830bis Review

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Mon, 15 January 2018 19:10 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C780512D959 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 11:10:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CQuauRRXglJ6 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 11:10:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl0-x22d.google.com (mail-pl0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0632B12EB78 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 11:10:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id 62so4345078pld.7 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 11:10:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=VyZ+pGq7LDcOE6PeRz7amPAjKu321vFMmBlpHVCwqGU=; b=mgmOAtWSRnu7dZoqVY6pV4PRY21Cv6ERrElt6TFwz4eizaN2sUiuoFdOzLzO9m6J3u CHIOmZ741KjoQFj0XX1R4xFR2CQNwHj4Xiqd3QDgnonKA8EtIDfvg1VEkBkHJa52LUuZ OKwS61kLHPeXcQYcQ+4OjA4NcDjQicB0iMHEPRESxbtIlUEHF/KQzJnKMj5LRnvPLPmf wKdjnYzIeYsMuVjoqEy/qUdTJYqLnaeBCxufgntarXBLcMYZKBAeNs+jsP0t+MRRn6M0 J/bYyMYWegmHYucDuvY0ooXNmMeo1X1DyfGU9WwCtaHl/ksLpHKdx+YkNouk06rW8HHj EnPg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=VyZ+pGq7LDcOE6PeRz7amPAjKu321vFMmBlpHVCwqGU=; b=YuixqjGYbzBcQhmaTP0b84JYtDOtRCzj6hKWyIwZJkypFEqESFq6sKSvDShcmzT4Vn /Oea7P+4+En93E5VEh2qBEcufXQgx2kLRiA8nU+S/vm1FcfQupdpKuckcAhtfnmOG4Kx X4TN/kBC6PtAVrW6zFrco11r5rTcudnCTNDQlSEcqSD8HfGrBI/nxJuV4gx9lmCeiznP tO1G8G3RAQejY7iN+xFQ1OSbMxf1m7UNPsbVXurWKUv9w0W1yRk4bmkfOGxt/SYy1ERK PvhZO9moOI0uCOj+20YBzvc0Pnybt9UA54ih0KQ78gtxHGJ/n0yOqE1chmQ6bCI+acLf +dfw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mKv2RSSpDfvMhrhpW1Rw5ZxVFgHOpdQINKuYKd3nmcBoEOMFUtL KBmuKwcOUqzmhxIlA9VAeD0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBos7fBBuVevhGaMR2/HgGzySbx8xSDsuqa5gHuGKWbb5TkuKeqLckatWIkcoNgJXqia9jcdXng==
X-Received: by 10.159.242.196 with SMTP id x4mr28168719plw.408.1516043437687; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 11:10:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.197.31.157] (173-11-119-245-SFBA.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [173.11.119.245]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 26sm404402pfq.102.2018.01.15.11.10.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Jan 2018 11:10:36 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+YHcKHEvE=CJZUYEUm9dm53oVnj8g7JNbrMdGkEu=mcRSBCQg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 11:10:35 -0800
Cc: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, "lisp@ietf.org list" <lisp@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E625760A-292B-439A-BAEC-49BEDDBEF688@gmail.com>
References: <907CD955-B043-4728-ABD6-5AD96192EC5F@inria.fr> <4EAD1E98-E8E7-4A0A-8300-2D185B9109CC@gigix.net> <CAGE_QexqW=q51kXR9fo_8YDu6VVUHCBz-XrGt5iZ6FOTRxDLiA@mail.gmail.com> <49EE7D2D-FC59-42F1-A93A-B315D4D6420E@gigix.net> <98C25E20-BD78-462A-BDB4-572AA24C1A97@gigix.net> <829870A2-2D90-4967-983A-56F62E765796@gmail.com> <5754BC06-9CBD-4C52-9CD6-402610EAABF1@gigix.net> <DA85FB85-45B8-4BF8-B5BC-F544E11AB90A@gmail.com> <CA+YHcKHxEJjFqm4z-PCo4LN_gv7v=mqQ7R47qPepLHJQ+kp=7w@mail.gmail.com> <F1137329-DA1F-4E50-9B94-386AC0B2B62B@gmail.com> <0F4F11DF-07B6-407D-BE5F-BBF1777D1CF2@gigix.net> <232ACD23-F1E0-49B0-983F-D17F773A99CA@gmail.com> <2241290D-29C3-4ACB-9726-ACC6DD42E8CE@gigix.net> <29E4D891-E429-4A71-BFC3-276F730EA5C6@gmail.com> <CA+YHcKHEvE=CJZUYEUm9dm53oVnj8g7JNbrMdGkEu=mcRSBCQg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alberto Rodriguez-Natal <rodrigueznatal@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/ZEqrepYqVB6_wfilFFv0Wc61eyI>
Subject: Re: [lisp] 6830bis Review
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 19:10:40 -0000

I’d be willing to make a deal.

SMRs go to 6833bis and RLOC-probes stay in 6830bis. Since RLOC-probes are connected (semantically) to echo-noncing which use bits in the LISP header.

Dino

> On Jan 15, 2018, at 10:32 AM, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal <rodrigueznatal@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 6:55 PM, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> SMRs and RLOC-probes are control-plane features used by xTRs to be able to run the data-plane.
>> 
>> They are data-plane features that use control-plane messages. No other devices sends an RLOC-probe (or SMR) then an xTR.
> 
> IMHO I think that the SMR should go into the control-plane document. I
> believe that there are many cases (specially from an SDN point of
> view) where you may want to send SMRs from entities other than xTRs.
> 
> There's already a draft [1] that proposes that SMRs can also be sent
> by MSMRs. That draft is documenting what has been implemented and
> running on OpenDaylight for a while now.
> 
> Furthermore, lig-lispmob [2] supports sending SMRs on demand through a
> CLI without running an xTR. I've found that capability useful on many
> occasions.
> 
> Alberto
> 
> [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-ms-smr-04
> [2] https://github.com/LISPmob/lig-lispmob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email