Re: [lisp] LISP SDN

Alberto Rodriguez-Natal <arnatal@ac.upc.edu> Wed, 19 February 2014 04:03 UTC

Return-Path: <arnatal@ac.upc.edu>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A53851A0310 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:03:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.827
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.827 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rNV0iNm-ydq7 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:03:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from roura.ac.upc.es (roura.ac.upc.edu [147.83.33.10]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 745A01A0309 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:03:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gw-3.ac.upc.es (gw-3.ac.upc.es [147.83.30.9]) by roura.ac.upc.es (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s1J43FXf013051 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 05:03:15 +0100
Received: from mail-yh0-f44.google.com (mail-yh0-f44.google.com [209.85.213.44]) by gw-3.ac.upc.es (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5371592 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 05:03:15 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-yh0-f44.google.com with SMTP id f73so16474422yha.17 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:03:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=ZsgcZgJ8hr+dbpe66K4VjJR17ZPFpKkLO/6Si8wg8y0=; b=HkKpuWSh2/aoD39hX4q2PonUffNlmJI9qTjvNFzvTMjWL9O/hXwIWhV94AXICWH51o vhev64UFWW3puah2bNjvShD6fTh9/N8RdisP/uxwOQPMHf7jxgUuaYeXfmo+H9LiyAFr +DnOOofBR8ZGS5QFm1M7VSPIXVxV4LjGhQI6matWEmkJ9/WvnM7zGaXzFM7NjucMUl1+ 0Gvq1qJRNfKmFdVoXuJMRkFvHhN3atVAqwlZtHhdtEtDmWTwy+CH63WTQwn6nV9rXtUX 2Xy7fLw+ycowjwP+hGg67k3d7VsP/ag9INVuDd3Z4mpctiv5D36LJ3CuwceXzpfKqspF sxkg==
X-Received: by 10.236.190.100 with SMTP id d64mr29199332yhn.76.1392782594018; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:03:14 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.170.51.209 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:02:52 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <240A8B2B-C0BD-40FF-AE40-E8A4C9CF8E2A@gmail.com>
References: <CA+YHcKF5aUK-ADsxaE7W1T9DmkON51LogDdDXVEWTq1jF5tDDA@mail.gmail.com> <240A8B2B-C0BD-40FF-AE40-E8A4C9CF8E2A@gmail.com>
From: Alberto Rodriguez-Natal <arnatal@ac.upc.edu>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 13:02:52 +0900
Message-ID: <CA+YHcKGv67R1ATnBg1fqK2tgCx3gftz9q2XL-3L7+K51TEiteQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf305e262bc411f904f2ba77c3"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/Wws6-KC9wUs7eU8w6xbcPybldEI
Cc: "lisp@ietf.org list" <lisp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lisp] LISP SDN
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 04:03:23 -0000

Hi Dino,

I mostly agree with all of your comments regarding the current text (with
some nuances of course), but I think that we can carry on that discussion
on London. However, let me address something here.


On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> wrote:

> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-sdn-00
>
> Alberto, enclosed are my comments. The draft text comes first and is
> indented and my comments follow.
>
> > Abstract
> >
> >    This document describes extensions for the Locator/ID Separation
> >    Protocol (LISP) to make it more suitable to be used on Software
> >    Defined Networking (SDN) scenarios.
>
> As others have said this draft is probably mis-titled. SDN, in
> understandable form, is a mechanism to program network devices. This spec
> says nothing about the programmability and more about how to do map-cache
> lookups locally in the xTR and how to what lookup-key should be used for
> mapping database lookups


My idea with the draft is to address all the extensions (with all the
required technical detail) to enhance LISP+SDN deployments, that's the
reason for the name. Please keep in mind that this is just a -00 version
and most of the content is still to be written. Despite the fact that the
text now refers mostly to flow aspects, my intention is to address other
points (such Publish/Subscribe mechanism, etc) on the near future.

I would prefer to keep all SDN related stuff here to avoid the
proliferation of drafts. If in the future we see that some parts (like what
you call "LISP granular map-caches") require too much technical detail,
then we should consider the spin-off of those parts to different drafts and
keep this draft as a "SDN umbrella" (as Michiel suggested).

At this point this draft is a tool to work on all the SDN specific aspects
of LISP and to generate some discussion.

Let's talk in London ;)

Alberto