Re: [lisp] Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-32: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Wed, 09 September 2020 22:11 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D84803A0F88; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 15:11:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q2R5i-LMZ22y; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 15:11:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x432.google.com (mail-pf1-x432.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::432]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99C233A0FA4; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 15:11:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x432.google.com with SMTP id n14so3385756pff.6; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 15:11:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=S9C3GXtiT30XJA9torxmJC9KewifPYDIRXL5dMCl2YY=; b=t8qQa5OD3aNSlToxOmS8002KoelLHIhCHL+ZzElb+z7qz8j7aH3MrcRIk9TVHpPGYu aKgmWLDlqxkmcj6VO6lz5dIwjxjXG6o4+mfXMsJsMILY//8+rj9I/zyiURp964H/3XhW vbfgm2trTrgVCYZQ28gGufst7CJCXFwt28HINxASkeG1gJbmYqBoiK4AisWwS01H/J8e XhdizU0m0AkKcWedn9XZ/YcJkgyI2R5OdrtSgYlZHIzLwuCSEO4HNXhCPSYVMxdZqdba yICqFXFSAlCdqeTxT2UPRtI1PLCH70lgeiUkLfqm90D6uIW/zkP6/g/khWo6M4D3jePh +R+A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=S9C3GXtiT30XJA9torxmJC9KewifPYDIRXL5dMCl2YY=; b=D2y8smBOpsEGalPaV56K4vdxgURn4J/UsEmAVBl8/gdscV9wSTUCrg+ENwbhOqESMJ CGKKta0By31aqk1iw/t2lCgwLANAYhrQXobAoDxMyxLvo7lHCY9yhgHwbGIDTtdjyIOi YlVkapOCIOaF/HRHkPELxcpY9Q/MqdRWqWyTAEdVcwbS7BhZHBWj12IexDD4EwcwrVi+ xBOXm3gYRHVIyvgTFEMaONdH/CpwVbX/yYp09zBYcM7ArZxWcLsDl7ZW25QXXwyZ2GzJ /4KTnm2Uqn/y/PoY7MbAJxbsetm4Dorv3Zv4GWEbAZV6xNWcgM0sjVX50yz/ziVuthZ5 FRPg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533c8as78e6gzX5E4JWWsZRI1UHwW+hh48Fj+TKUQs78SbyDFTfn xZcOVCx3SGubvhM0oleg+ADbZbmG7kJVdQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzRoZK2RAqA56gmY/kw4BSYZWnmuvNy+sZBVDLii3U9EqOMCjXWBVbNF2Y2SyMz89a58lKQ1g==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:413:: with SMTP id 19mr2105447pge.310.1599689508837; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 15:11:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.87.29] (c-73-71-108-5.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.71.108.5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r15sm3182020pgg.17.2020.09.09.15.11.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 09 Sep 2020 15:11:48 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 15:11:46 -0700
Message-Id: <80A1A3F0-A9DD-4A0C-B037-37545A7BA9EC@gmail.com>
References: <CAM4esxQaLhRQGDXr6Dh7tA3oSjBSni9F2wmNmjpzvGxfBpUf4g@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, Albert Cabellos <albert.cabellos@gmail.com>, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis@ietf.org, "lisp@ietf.org list" <lisp@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAM4esxQaLhRQGDXr6Dh7tA3oSjBSni9F2wmNmjpzvGxfBpUf4g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17H33)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/ayJiiwOtYHj5DcC-ydXzQUM5ts0>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-32: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 22:11:53 -0000


> On Sep 9, 2020, at 3:02 PM, Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Yes, that is the case I meant, and I see now that it will work just fine. Thanks for thinking it through with me.

And note the ICMP packet could exit a different ITR and get encap’ed to a different ETR at the LISP site where the original source EID resides. But that is normal LISP operation. 

Dino