Re: [lisp] LISP Overlay Model

+1

Victor

> On Aug 13, 2015, at 4:40 PM, Florin Coras <fcoras.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> +1 
> 
> Florin
> 
>> On Aug 14, 2015, at 12:49 AM, Vina Ermagan (vermagan) <vermagan@cisco.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Yes to extending the overlay model to support multiple data plane encap
>> types.
>> 
>> Vina
>> 
>>> On 8/9/15 3:05 PM, "Luigi Iannone" <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> LISP provides a rather complete and powerful control-plane, where
>>> by means of LCAF, possibly any existing namespace can be mapped
>>> on each other.
>>> However, the data-plane is not as flexible. The current specifications
>>> allow only IPv4 over IPv6 and vice versa.
>>> 
>>> In order to create what Sharon Barakai defined ³map assisted overlays²
>>> more work is needed.
>>> 
>>> In this context the WG should also decide whether just an
>>> extended/enhanced
>>> data-plane is sufficient/needed. Or should the scope be slightly larger
>>> and 
>>> allow as well to support multiple headers type?
>>> Such header are not necessarily defined by the LISP WG
>>> (e.g.  VXLAN-GPE, GENEVE, GUE, etc.)
>>> 
>>> Would the WG be interested in working in extending the LISP overlay model
>>> in order to provide data-plane support for what the control plane already
>>> allows?
>>> And what should be the scope?
>>> 
>>> Joel & Luigi
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> lisp mailing list
>>> lisp@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> lisp mailing list
>> lisp@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp