IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] LISP Overlay Model

"Vina Ermagan (vermagan)" <vermagan@cisco.com> Thu, 13 August 2015 22:49 UTC

Return-Path: <vermagan@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B4C1B3BB6 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 15:49:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v4p_OoWVPF22 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 15:49:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C35441ACE7D for <lisp@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 15:49:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1200; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1439506170; x=1440715770; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=wIUXrAwbc8OgGzBP3rwTC6kapFypg3VHkRn0dgeGeEM=; b=BMRLLQtBIpQR8Aixvv3ElmNWBb+wXrxNeB9OIudmcYKgmCn4gzClNLlN cxF5NbYHcRaMVEyV+2QcyuoVjDb5cvHdtqFis0PTE8c3fmTk1Paz32J7O O31U51mwfOE9rNnc77D/Ss9dqcPsXDkt0H8WeElJwN3qgzal8gatxdnl6 M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0B3AgB9Hs1V/5hdJa1dgxtUaQa9eAEJgWsKhXkCgUY4FAEBAQEBAQGBCoQkAQEEAQEBawsQAgEIDjgnCyUCBAENBYguDdB5AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBEwSLU4UJB4QsBY0TiAcBh2+EfJokJoN9cYFIgQQBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,673,1432598400"; d="scan'208";a="178391439"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Aug 2015 22:49:17 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com (xch-aln-008.cisco.com [173.36.7.18]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t7DMnHIJ028688 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 13 Aug 2015 22:49:17 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-008.cisco.com (173.36.7.18) by XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com (173.36.7.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 17:49:16 -0500
Received: from xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com (173.36.12.88) by xch-aln-008.cisco.com (173.36.7.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 17:49:16 -0500
Received: from xmb-aln-x07.cisco.com ([169.254.2.62]) by xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com ([173.36.12.88]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 17:49:16 -0500
From: "Vina Ermagan (vermagan)" <vermagan@cisco.com>
To: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [lisp] LISP Overlay Model
Thread-Index: AQHQ0u+ISWFCJaTPOkmA8lzplhyarp4KbSaA
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 22:49:15 +0000
Message-ID: <D1F26CBE.5DD91%vermagan@cisco.com>
References: <89CA974F-ADB1-444E-BF65-7C2B8C572AA6@gigix.net>
In-Reply-To: <89CA974F-ADB1-444E-BF65-7C2B8C572AA6@gigix.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.3.140616
x-originating-ip: [173.37.102.13]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <02A53573507B374EA3F33F44EA5C01A6@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/3N9JAclcP9H8UxJke5OSCmZM3oI>
Cc: Joel Halpern Direct <jmh.direct@joelhalpern.com>, Damien Saucez <damien.saucez@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [lisp] LISP Overlay Model
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 22:49:31 -0000

Yes to extending the overlay model to support multiple data plane encap
types.

Vina

On 8/9/15 3:05 PM, "Luigi Iannone" <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>LISP provides a rather complete and powerful control-plane, where
>by means of LCAF, possibly any existing namespace can be mapped
>on each other.
>However, the data-plane is not as flexible. The current specifications
>allow only IPv4 over IPv6 and vice versa.
>
>In order to create what Sharon Barakai defined ³map assisted overlays²
>more work is needed.
>
>In this context the WG should also decide whether just an
>extended/enhanced
>data-plane is sufficient/needed. Or should the scope be slightly larger
>and 
>allow as well to support multiple headers type?
>Such header are not necessarily defined by the LISP WG
>(e.g.  VXLAN-GPE, GENEVE, GUE, etc.)
>
>Would the WG be interested in working in extending the LISP overlay model
>in order to provide data-plane support for what the control plane already
>allows?
>And what should be the scope?
>
>Joel & Luigi
>
>  
>_______________________________________________
>lisp mailing list
>lisp@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email