IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] LISP Overlay Model

Florin Coras <fcoras.lists@gmail.com> Thu, 13 August 2015 23:38 UTC

Return-Path: <fcoras.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD8081ACEE1 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:38:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XfnY_qIQuGia for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:38:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22b.google.com (mail-wi0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC2781ACEE0 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:38:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wicja10 with SMTP id ja10so2014672wic.1 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:38:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=lT5CKlertxsJpSg4qHP3Fzak9a2n485pICzGkf1mRiw=; b=01EP+CiuWcW0axLJpMAu2+sFuBAl3U3dNW0VeCu/kWFqIPqJZSGftlAYcbfrwluGWK +fS8PXczGZVOvBBC/Z4zE2RR3/dFWrnifiUh0E5nxzq6sU6jZK9zLbi8ql9hxe8tycUC SgpipQY7brCLC7Xkhl59ZheZjF5bjMs1nZCW8HMKbOVAC/K3kJTF5SSeoV/4mqHQCj4V wypQTrmIfnsx/wNXQjf+LODX2psYVsyjPxyUU2kg5GmhIj5W5fsS0onnMP7G7PkcPcTa 40dNhQLl+oRxZDMxG8xezGQWlL37VeAo0K1ChDAo1UL2KR6KbdXH11iIT3eaIJF3zFQ+ KXqA==
X-Received: by 10.180.221.140 with SMTP id qe12mr12209329wic.54.1439509102663; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:38:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.105] ([90.74.25.36]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id gm20sm5523230wjc.17.2015.08.13.16.38.21 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:38:21 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Florin Coras <fcoras.lists@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <D1F26CBE.5DD91%vermagan@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 01:38:20 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F8376953-B0AE-4AE1-BCF0-7C7603A2F56E@gmail.com>
References: <89CA974F-ADB1-444E-BF65-7C2B8C572AA6@gigix.net> <D1F26CBE.5DD91%vermagan@cisco.com>
To: "Vina Ermagan (vermagan)" <vermagan@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2102)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/vuFRYXnMjAuLBKALCv2OtRPM9nc>
Cc: Joel Halpern Direct <jmh.direct@joelhalpern.com>, Damien Saucez <damien.saucez@inria.fr>, LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lisp] LISP Overlay Model
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 23:39:57 -0000

+1 

Florin

> On Aug 14, 2015, at 12:49 AM, Vina Ermagan (vermagan) <vermagan@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> Yes to extending the overlay model to support multiple data plane encap
> types.
> 
> Vina
> 
> On 8/9/15 3:05 PM, "Luigi Iannone" <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> LISP provides a rather complete and powerful control-plane, where
>> by means of LCAF, possibly any existing namespace can be mapped
>> on each other.
>> However, the data-plane is not as flexible. The current specifications
>> allow only IPv4 over IPv6 and vice versa.
>> 
>> In order to create what Sharon Barakai defined ³map assisted overlays²
>> more work is needed.
>> 
>> In this context the WG should also decide whether just an
>> extended/enhanced
>> data-plane is sufficient/needed. Or should the scope be slightly larger
>> and 
>> allow as well to support multiple headers type?
>> Such header are not necessarily defined by the LISP WG
>> (e.g.  VXLAN-GPE, GENEVE, GUE, etc.)
>> 
>> Would the WG be interested in working in extending the LISP overlay model
>> in order to provide data-plane support for what the control plane already
>> allows?
>> And what should be the scope?
>> 
>> Joel & Luigi
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> lisp mailing list
>> lisp@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email