Re: [lisp] Review 6833bis

["Joel M. Halpern" <[e-mail]>]

Assuming this 10.4 is now 7.3 and that we are disucssing the text in 
4.1, as written the text does not make sense
A new document can not specify a preferred value in a section in an 
existing document.

I am not sure what it is trying to say.  It mostly seems to be saying 
something that is IANA policy (can you request a specific code point 
from a registry).

As best I can tell, it should be removed.

Yours,
Joel

On 3/18/18 1:06 PM, Dino Farinacci wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I’ve read 6833bis document.
>> My few comments cab be found inline.
> 
> See comments inline. New draft enclosed with diff file. I’ll wait 6 hours to post to give you a chance to look it over.
> 
...
> 
>>>     Values in the "Not Assigned" range can be assigned according to
>>>     procedures in [RFC8126].  Documents that request for a new LISP
>>>     packet type MAY indicate a preferred value in Section 10.4.
>>>
>> Don’t understand the “in Section 10.4” part. Should be deleted.
> 
> This was added when we were writing draft-ietf-lisp-type-iana (RFC8113). It was a request from someone (not Mohammad) I think. Didn’t change.
>