IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lmap] WGLC for draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-13

Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com> Mon, 12 December 2016 20:37 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4F131297B8 for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 12:37:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TM8YiMpCPeZq for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 12:37:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22e.google.com (mail-qt0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 736521297AA for <lmap@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 12:37:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id p16so87831388qta.0 for <lmap@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 12:37:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fz69ezLPKQcSqBnwdy1GqLTBwcUH9008n0/PZzo3oKM=; b=sXBy5dtGQqeSMTDCs1b0O71mZ1ZOHertqcyaxAxtwWmnDycI/sCMN2tibWNMMN4pKd s25hOxMb9v0C9RjZNZ5bF4pV5YZ92G0vtzjSnGTMUEQalhMPsrJJK1Wbf6vktBJHxuNF jhO+m3OzyxSRA1vZW622VfK0HyzJM6Blr+VaQ0MGY6HGKmUZmCi0Lwh6kUsDKnJci4Ec oIbogLSUQ4Da9E2iQg84ik8X1ZZ6qPaj7e2EsDuwDahrTSQuBPX6hmPKa7hKBbU8FScB VWOo4xpyH4lzNzu6BxiPfJPf2PnWDevL0k40BmEGDR6y03mzOBbHmjm+UKjgQo1Q+1KO Nh5g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fz69ezLPKQcSqBnwdy1GqLTBwcUH9008n0/PZzo3oKM=; b=AQcNEm0Q2d6G29tCqidEJO9FaCeGUSu7ovmF6u7vxriGSLyF3087oG/EL7EVYKmaQZ rX3AVgOPE+d199bQLYlugpPb9qRR8/LiQ5zWH2DgfripJqP+/Fo+BG9NWEdLU2vxa944 5DaEXyGVFjQm1yUo8s6CzzXOg/IKJHFT7SeFZgmuwr6zNTa/HCozG1eoZ2l7bpWNjVg2 7qrBiZt8skIeUg4eCHQHuyB6rDAT9ODTIxOrVTXwo8OFO2yxFMghWABuXjaQLhuFbR24 QI1Nm7A4Uw47KC3VFWDDGitqYnPKiAtxhrcEA1slA6R1AY9ssVnv4KRD9/+besDmYRAV bHEg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00ygAFIX2MOzguRNowXU+bEwn2CUXLwBsUvSKWqi0RhLAQw5HW5fnB3ibqVjztxeEmlWvDS7Ahn/jj39w==
X-Received: by 10.237.57.137 with SMTP id m9mr89097513qte.35.1481575056590; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 12:37:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.40.114 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 12:37:36 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <9966516C6EB5FC4381E05BF80AA55F77012A80B7B3@US70UWXCHMBA05.zam.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <CAFgnS4Ve_A0F3eOt2GtH3YUau=qcbie9M_M1RMypw+MKz+-Y+Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAFgnS4XCCW30p1Ruqe6aStS35OPz3yt5eN8ysP90nT85+ZEMxw@mail.gmail.com> <9966516C6EB5FC4381E05BF80AA55F77012A80B7B3@US70UWXCHMBA05.zam.alcatel-lucent.com>
From: Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 22:37:36 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFgnS4WnZDSaLMZC+cpmV-xU97WFpBZOkUk00OWLdOCUv-s61g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Carey, Timothy (Nokia - US)" <timothy.carey@nokia.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11410e62f4cc8205437c12a4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lmap/36IC3hHj66gB7PEtiTQgPhQGLo8>
Cc: "lmap@ietf.org" <lmap@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lmap] WGLC for draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-13
X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance <lmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:lmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 20:37:40 -0000

Hi Tim,

Can you share the comments on the mail list? If I missed them - can you
point to the message? We were not planning a new revision of the IM - so we
need to get consensus on the changes.

Thanks and Regards,

Dan


On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Carey, Timothy (Nokia - US) <
timothy.carey@nokia.com> wrote:

> Dan,
>
>
>
> I provided comments to Juergen which I believe is expected to go into a
> new revision of the IM.
>
>
>
> I do not know of IP relevant to this document.
>
> BBF plans to define a TR-069 data model based on the IM defined in this
> document.
>
>
>
> BR,
>
> Tim
>
>
>
> *From:* Dan Romascanu [mailto:dromasca@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, December 12, 2016 6:11 AM
> *To:* lmap@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [lmap] WGLC for draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-13
>
>
>
> The WGLC concluded. There were no comments. Taking silence as consensus we
> shall go ahead and prepare the submission for to the IESG.
>
> At this point we would request the WG participants:
>
> 1. to let us know if there are any known Intellectual Property relevant to
> this document
>
> 2. to let us know if there are any implementations or plans to implement
> the IM defined in this document
>
> Thanks and Regards,
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 6:23 PM, Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This message starts an LMAP WGLC for draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-13
> - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lmap-information-model/.
>
> Please let us know if you believe that this document is ready to be sent
> to the IESG for consideration as Proposed Standards. It's OK to state that
> the document is just fine, it's even better to let us know if you have
> concerns and comments to improve and detail them. Messages about
> implementations or plans to implement are also welcome. Please send these
> before Monday December 5, 2016.
>
> Thanks and Regards,
>
> Jason and Dan
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email