Re: [lmap] WGLC for draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-13

Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com> Mon, 12 December 2016 12:10 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 844C91296B4 for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 04:10:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UAOJFfKBVrKh for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 04:10:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x231.google.com (mail-qt0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1AC21296BF for <lmap@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 04:10:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x231.google.com with SMTP id w33so73443539qtc.3 for <lmap@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 04:10:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=OaLECkpmzvurEOoYXUHR2zouayroZru3ntg31yQ1Xu4=; b=IowL+4u3kQw1qluds7iEzSni8NG/RCvFA7tTRhBtBZdHNPhcUPpdw/7LQyhGx2O5ZB 4IFF7sAHdWo+B0aT97h7XOGEpxvKW4VCuMdIXMrGJwJEZZGZZfMtRkuWzIwiHDrNYy0e d4uMmUH9Wg6hfRJ83Trm2CUoqJBT8CJSuia/c6n2l7BOo2c1OPROC86k/+pSVcR53MLN exZIPoPJ95l7SUIwY2HUtji3MPmer5jYBTcKf0gqngJec9lmBn4ii5lYmvR04mX9ZJoe yCLbikzv9uL0Y7n1AfWchUFZPutav3mYF1seHso6HlDVhq/OZ0BRwxmLp2uunVXoweCu lh3Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=OaLECkpmzvurEOoYXUHR2zouayroZru3ntg31yQ1Xu4=; b=huB6ICBYLzkvgwMLEkBVSAQ2QQ97MoTHSaPXuGmHP0BjiExrtcSSi4eDQSlwQ2reJy 5Uwl6/G110xQ+65JU2ID76GIZw82KbVMZuhzi/9KmYQIi60fIuH+GzYOmqBWTPUbHvyt /C5xvBxUAzuK8GnwVkZk2RQ4g3gvC1BVM0MHPCsH7VoKiBbDFYDxcUITQc8+p+7SG1WW z9Nfe/5sj6ascs9NOEA1O9vAbDPNQygZvKAeAxTyAa1hhXKq9VDlarqu7tVof1CRzeGw uVtpGfrYI+gQJmEj79dyyn0uTs4sIondgBtYYP/E3PoMnuNfmomnIXpOnx/vrbvmomV1 K0XQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02Wn3LjKH5LrOhG4zGCixkuVT8NHRDwdTHtWk1/dCLmZMbPF5j/i+8lzvgGyGdcQWcZZTI4UVPpZ87D5g==
X-Received: by 10.200.46.129 with SMTP id h1mr78563616qta.277.1481544630936; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 04:10:30 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.40.114 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 04:10:30 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAFgnS4Ve_A0F3eOt2GtH3YUau=qcbie9M_M1RMypw+MKz+-Y+Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFgnS4Ve_A0F3eOt2GtH3YUau=qcbie9M_M1RMypw+MKz+-Y+Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 14:10:30 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFgnS4XCCW30p1Ruqe6aStS35OPz3yt5eN8ysP90nT85+ZEMxw@mail.gmail.com>
To: lmap@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1135dede722985054374fddb"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lmap/X5h9T-fBp9ij93GE6S65ErwYf6E>
Subject: Re: [lmap] WGLC for draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-13
X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance <lmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:lmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 12:10:37 -0000

The WGLC concluded. There were no comments. Taking silence as consensus we
shall go ahead and prepare the submission for to the IESG.

At this point we would request the WG participants:

1. to let us know if there are any known Intellectual Property relevant to
this document
2. to let us know if there are any implementations or plans to implement
the IM defined in this document

Thanks and Regards,

Dan


On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 6:23 PM, Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com> wrote:

> This message starts an LMAP WGLC for draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-13
> - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lmap-information-model/.
>
> Please let us know if you believe that this document is ready to be sent
> to the IESG for consideration as Proposed Standards. It's OK to state that
> the document is just fine, it's even better to let us know if you have
> concerns and comments to improve and detail them. Messages about
> implementations or plans to implement are also welcome. Please send these
> before Monday December 5, 2016.
>
> Thanks and Regards,
>
> Jason and Dan
>
>
>