Re: [lmap] Call for contributions and Agenda time in Berlin

Hi Dan,

I will attend the Berlin meeting and would like to talk with Marc
Linsner and Phil Eardley.

I think our case will be classified as  "Multi-provider Network Measurements" or
an extension to the Multi-Provider use case
in the use case document.

A single organization performs a measurement from users to multiple
OTT providers.

Regards,

Ken Nagami

2013/7/9 Romascanu, Dan (Dan) <dromasca@avaya.com>:
> Hi Javier and Nagami,
>
>
>
> Thank you for letting the lmap list know about your applications and for
> offering your help. It may be useful if you would talk with Marc Linsner and
> Phil Eardley who have authored the use case document and see if your
> experience can add to this. The current version in the tracker is
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-linsner-lmap-use-cases/ but there may
> be a revision in preparation for the Internet Draft submission cut-off next
> Monday.
>
>
>
> Will you attend the Berlin meeting?
>
>
>
> Thanks and Regards,
>
>
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: lmap-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:lmap-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Javier Bustos
> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 4:32 PM
> To: Nagami Kenichi
> Cc: MORTON JR., ALFRED C (AL); lmap WG
>
>
> Subject: Re: [lmap] Call for contributions and Agenda time in Berlin
>
>
>
> Dear Al and Dan
>
>
>
> We would like to contribute for LMAP too.
>
>
>
> Here in Chile we have performed active measurements for wired internet
> (around 10,000 probes) and passive measurements for mobile internet (around
> 750 probes).
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Javier Bustos.
>
>
>
> 2013/7/1 Nagami Kenichi <nagami@wide.ad.jp>
>
> Dear Al and Dan,
>
> We would like to contribute some use case for LMAP.
> We have measured the broadband performance in Japan using measurement
> software. We have distributed 500,000 applications.
>
> Regards,
> Ken Nagami
>
> 2013/6/22 MORTON JR., ALFRED C (AL) <acmorton@att.com>:
>
>> LMAP,
>>
>> Last week, the draft LMAP charter went forward for external review.
>> LMAP has been approved for a placeholder session at IETF-87,
>> either as a Working Group if approved in time, or as a BoF if not.
>> If charter-related issues remain to be resolved, they will be
>> discussed during the session with highest priority.
>>
>> However, ...
>>
>> If you have new/revised contributions covered under the current
>> draft of the LMAP charter, please reply to the list identifying the topic,
>> the filename(if applicable) and the related issues you would like to
>> discuss at
>> a face-to-face session, and try to do this by June 28, 2013.
>>
>> thanks and regards,
>> Dan and Al
>>
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-announce-
>>> bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of The IESG
>>> Sent: Friday, June 14, 2013 11:42 AM
>>> To: IETF-Announce
>>> Cc: lmap WG
>>> Subject: WG Review: Large-Scale Measurement of Broadband Performance
>>> (lmap)
>>>
>>> A new IETF working group has been proposed in the Operations and
>>> Management Area. The IESG has not made any determination yet. The
>>> following draft charter was submitted, and is provided for informational
>>> purposes only. Please send your comments to the IESG mailing list (iesg
>>> at ietf.org) by 2013-06-24.
>>>
>>> Large-Scale Measurement of Broadband Performance (lmap)
>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>> Current Status: Proposed WG
>>>
>>> Assigned Area Director:
>>>   Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
>>>...
>> _______________________________________________
>> lmap mailing list
>> lmap@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap
>>
> _______________________________________________
> lmap mailing list
> lmap@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lmap mailing list
> lmap@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap
>