Re: [lmap] LMAP: time to declare success ... ?

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Wed, 14 February 2018 09:43 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8465126D73 for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 01:43:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S3McaErxmABv for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 01:43:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A4AA126CF9 for <lmap@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 01:43:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7928; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1518601386; x=1519810986; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=G0Nxriy9lV9lVFmOLe2FvBYuB4mponzUI/5rPQBGze0=; b=H5A4tYDQU1ramIygMk9Dpmkwzhj25ephhcYHfiH+7wq4yyJIienEzLdv jdQJfSWzYzeF5z06PyqbVySsbGyddKTBC03T7gGlIjGYKOYNggp6V38kt uyPpH0RUq1mvQD/1EALsQiUd/IYe/QnrIaUe4kKa6q6MBTAvBui3Lg15G c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0B2AQBUBIRa/xbLJq1ZAxkBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEHAQEBAQGDJYETcCiDZYsYjw4ngReQZodzChgBCoM6gV4Cg0gUAQIBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQECayiFJAEBAQMBASFLGQIJAg4CCCcDAgIbDB8RBgEMBgIBAYoxEJIfnXSCJ?= =?us-ascii?q?yaEW4N/ghMBAQEBAQEBAQIBAQEBAQEBAQEBGQUFhHyDbIFoKQyCeYMvAQECghA?= =?us-ascii?q?mglCCZQWKY4lgj2sJlgSMPIgIj3+IGYE8NiIlgSszGggbFT2CRoIcgV8BB3VAN?= =?us-ascii?q?41sAQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,511,1511827200"; d="scan'208,217";a="2062455"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Feb 2018 09:42:58 +0000
Received: from [10.55.221.36] (ams-bclaise-nitro3.cisco.com [10.55.221.36]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w1E9gwBt026106; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 09:42:58 GMT
To: Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com>, Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, "lmap@ietf.org" <lmap@ietf.org>, Ignas Bagdonas <ibagdona.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <f3e7abc7-493a-5d9f-6eb1-89f3a553e8e6@cisco.com> <20180203165418.5sg3dtqcjfuawk6v@elstar.local> <CAFgnS4XsoiyFFpHGNqR36=NRk9uTBdCFWzYO9=OuatT4iSREbA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <9b11d4cf-740a-e942-6359-e7a727e43600@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 10:42:58 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAFgnS4XsoiyFFpHGNqR36=NRk9uTBdCFWzYO9=OuatT4iSREbA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------34693187FDCD412A7985CCE0"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lmap/7SaAxDPRMTw_22sSldYSBWMVXeY>
Subject: Re: [lmap] LMAP: time to declare success ... ?
X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance <lmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:lmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 09:43:09 -0000

Hi Dan,

"declaring success?" was an image to mean "shall we close the WG?"

If my memory serves me well... At charter time (in 2013!), there were 
discussions regarding the data models and specific protocols. YANG was 
not necessary a given or even a goal. When specifying a YANG data model, 
that simplified the choice of associated protocols.

Regards, Benoit
> Hi,
>
> I do not believe that we can really declare success without having 
> completed one of the key goals of our charter. My opinion is that 
> draft-ietf-lmap-restconf-04.txt needs to be done. We may be able to do 
> it without keeping the WG active. If the WG closes, my preference 
> would be OPSAWG rather than Independent Stream.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dan
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 6:54 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder 
> <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de 
> <mailto:j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>> wrote:
>
>     On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 03:21:12PM +0100, Benoit Claise wrote:
>     >
>     > The charter speaks about the control and report protocols.
>     > draft-ietf-lmap-restconf-04.txt, now expired, describes in 7
>     pages how
>     > RESTCONF can be used with a YANG data model for LMAP.
>     >
>     > Is it time to declare success and move on?
>     > Unless there are spectacular activities in the next 2 or 3
>     weeks, I'll take
>     > action before stepping down as AD.
>     >
>     > Note that publishing draft-ietf-lmap-restconf could still
>     proceed in the
>     > Independent Submission Stream, if there is some future energy to
>     do so.
>
>     draft-ietf-lmap-restconf-04.txt depends on the NETCONF/RESTCONF
>     configuration drafts done in the NETCONF WG; these NETCONF I-Ds have
>     not been moving because people put priority on getting NMDA out of the
>     door.
>
>     Since nobody seems to be pushing for getting
>     draft-ietf-lmap-restconf-04.txt done, it might be OK to just let it
>     go.
>
>     /js
>
>     --
>     Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
>     Phone: +49 421 200 3587 <tel:%2B49%20421%20200%203587>       
>      Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
>     Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <tel:%2B49%20421%20200%203103>       
>      <https://www.jacobs-university.de/
>     <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     lmap mailing list
>     lmap@ietf.org <mailto:lmap@ietf.org>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap
>     <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap>
>
>