Re: [lmap] LMAP: time to declare success ... ?

Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com> Sun, 04 February 2018 11:18 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 409B5126CF6 for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 03:18:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.019
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.019 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cDdZS_miuBO7 for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 03:18:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-f169.google.com (mail-qk0-f169.google.com [209.85.220.169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F48F1200B9 for <lmap@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 03:18:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-f169.google.com with SMTP id d125so8833457qkg.13 for <lmap@ietf.org>; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 03:18:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=DRULfG2VpM/+BaxJILBIZb0eDYYimKW8NUM/628c7yk=; b=mCqvVeX7LCpX40HI3dD7mdybd9QPn8ib9fAqqJ7nRwSZ0YHiwqs1hYaUYLF1AMlrq3 0fuOhUeanfTl3rV4y8tdLogLwh3o1xng7b9GKJAWsOnJ6UBOC6Bsgj+/d2exjjfMceAV +VHw6C/u1+EXv/0Ol5EmMwMnBCFYBHmESrn0fshM1DRbSz+/zkSFK0qq3EdPUZak1qFn vT+EzBZQerVLcOuPe2ETbn1mT7ev21dYErbLCpBy1jginNqXfCUpov77MqM4f3TocbJW Mddc/67ktTtjComOJNHVTwTGWhrnIH6kbeAjp156HiypEyJfrkXaRzpVc66mo67R2tH+ nXhw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=DRULfG2VpM/+BaxJILBIZb0eDYYimKW8NUM/628c7yk=; b=RXXraks1W98813Xn+mnOs/VfSGweYr68ALHI2SRjsXFQy3O0wWUirGr9i8Tzkeb2Ki x1RWb+Fb31LU1aVH4L4tW61RFav7s+LvslZ4xRMhS94DMjmgMlSF22LHNGswFV53y0qb sDFAnnECWsLqo5spmV+uGvXqDk167XGJy9dpNH++aa7RRoVNTHaW7PO+f3AEBzZgNHww tWp+9Gx5uhJAQcsBBTHYXlioDdqF+A8ecCToT4MU8VSqUoco5iL/z4xGPb0svuIRAh41 1udN9RN40Sq7vEijpXkZoYnQAzLf/624zNACBQz5zb6EjfzMi/IYSrRQJ0CIrcTh0+FQ I89g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytdvW65aBbLJa8h8dKL8Twuf+nKlRDLv948vGQRXc+B1iOQcLP7R 27nVmcohnYr2+mFVPX5jDjI9rTuj4YVs0v1fmvX0TA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x226R1Pexz/poshM5SclOFuJRhCCVKnjBNt/uv1EuQmrvsnEbSaeezVNf4MZuqH7FiLbWp/u0b3FkduTe+6GhjXk=
X-Received: by 10.55.73.1 with SMTP id w1mr26474680qka.215.1517743042355; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 03:17:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.23.147 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 03:17:21 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20180203165418.5sg3dtqcjfuawk6v@elstar.local>
References: <f3e7abc7-493a-5d9f-6eb1-89f3a553e8e6@cisco.com> <20180203165418.5sg3dtqcjfuawk6v@elstar.local>
From: Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 13:17:21 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFgnS4XsoiyFFpHGNqR36=NRk9uTBdCFWzYO9=OuatT4iSREbA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, "lmap@ietf.org" <lmap@ietf.org>, Ignas Bagdonas <ibagdona.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114a6de8e664cc05646116d2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lmap/EDCGmpU0GcnF89TI3I2yMiad_YM>
Subject: Re: [lmap] LMAP: time to declare success ... ?
X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance <lmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:lmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2018 11:18:25 -0000

Hi,

I do not believe that we can really declare success without having
completed one of the key goals of our charter. My opinion is that
draft-ietf-lmap-restconf-04.txt needs to be done. We may be able to do it
without keeping the WG active. If the WG closes, my preference would be
OPSAWG rather than Independent Stream.

Regards,

Dan


On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 6:54 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <
j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> wrote:

> On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 03:21:12PM +0100, Benoit Claise wrote:
> >
> > The charter speaks about the control and report protocols.
> > draft-ietf-lmap-restconf-04.txt, now expired, describes in 7 pages how
> > RESTCONF can be used with a YANG data model for LMAP.
> >
> > Is it time to declare success and move on?
> > Unless there are spectacular activities in the next 2 or 3 weeks, I'll
> take
> > action before stepping down as AD.
> >
> > Note that publishing draft-ietf-lmap-restconf could still proceed in the
> > Independent Submission Stream, if there is some future energy to do so.
>
> draft-ietf-lmap-restconf-04.txt depends on the NETCONF/RESTCONF
> configuration drafts done in the NETCONF WG; these NETCONF I-Ds have
> not been moving because people put priority on getting NMDA out of the
> door.
>
> Since nobody seems to be pushing for getting
> draft-ietf-lmap-restconf-04.txt done, it might be OK to just let it
> go.
>
> /js
>
> --
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lmap mailing list
> lmap@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap
>