IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lmap] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-lmap-framework-12: (with COMMENT)

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Tue, 14 April 2015 14:25 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 527A41AC3A6; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 07:25:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u-pC6zISXaAY; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 07:25:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D28B1AC39C; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 07:25:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6864; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1429021526; x=1430231126; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=ZqhYvQIioikaVIfpukvzEqJBrpy7TWMaMc0QBfD8gmA=; b=PosLkw86RKdhIijQ81CULUAXxHb7+fbV2a8kXt4jnwYfxgqYEvG3TseI fS6eJyvxfbPn6+S8hc35g6ocy9Cp1zA5cN3X4Mru23VSIq5Z+Jou6KxAg tYtAtl6Ox9diCH9a/IgaQOfFUqXZhk1lTXYD9i7RgU+qOG2uZkoGXkQ3k M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AXBQBnIi1V/5NdJa1cgkVHgS4FzTgCgUFMAQEBAQEBfoQgAQEEeRACAQg/BzIUEQIEAQ0FiCrLTgEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAReLK4R8B4QtAQSOdIIaihGUbCKCM4E8b4FEfwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,576,1422921600"; d="scan'208,217";a="411802036"
Received: from rcdn-core-11.cisco.com ([173.37.93.147]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Apr 2015 14:25:25 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com [173.37.183.86]) by rcdn-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t3EEPPYR027182 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 14 Apr 2015 14:25:25 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x15.cisco.com ([169.254.9.6]) by xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com ([173.37.183.86]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 09:25:25 -0500
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: "philip.eardley@bt.com" <philip.eardley@bt.com>, "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [lmap] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-lmap-framework-12: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHQchW9QabkthxmsU6MrPf7J7YW2p1MlWAAgABT1AD//8D7gA==
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 14:25:24 +0000
Message-ID: <D1529B72.A6C51%aretana@cisco.com>
References: <20150408160353.15564.41103.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <552CD98A.9020408@cisco.com> <e866f67c840941199922cdc7d54d12b5@rew09926dag03b.domain1.systemhost.net>
In-Reply-To: <e866f67c840941199922cdc7d54d12b5@rew09926dag03b.domain1.systemhost.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.117.15.4]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D1529B72A6C51aretanaciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lmap/l7KSuIsx2lvBUjS-fsM1pH9ji8w>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 07:32:13 -0700
Cc: "dromasca@avaya.com" <dromasca@avaya.com>, "lmap-chairs@ietf.org" <lmap-chairs@ietf.org>, "lmap@ietf.org" <lmap@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lmap] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-lmap-framework-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance <lmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:lmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 14:25:28 -0000

On 4/14/15, 10:10 AM, "philip.eardley@bt.com<mailto:philip.eardley@bt.com>" <philip.eardley@bt.com<mailto:philip.eardley@bt.com>> wrote:

On comment 2 and Benoit’s reply

If I remember some earlier discussion, it wasn’t obvious to everyone that there can be non-IETF registries.



How about this:

      *  the Metric, specified as a URI to a registry entry; it includes

         the specification of a Measurement Method. The registry could be defined by a standards organisation or locally by the operator of the Measurement System. Note that the IETF

               currently works on such a registry specification

         [I-D.ietf-ippm-metric-registry].

Thank works for me.

Thanks!

Alvaro.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email