Re: [lmap] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-lmap-framework-12: (with COMMENT)
"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Tue, 14 April 2015 14:21 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 717841A9166; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 07:21:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id daL8405wZix1; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 07:21:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B09C1A92DD; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 07:21:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.23] (cpe-70-119-203-4.tx.res.rr.com [70.119.203.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t3EEKdTm082750 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 14 Apr 2015 09:20:50 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-70-119-203-4.tx.res.rr.com [70.119.203.4] claimed to be [10.0.1.23]
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: philip.eardley@bt.com
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 09:20:39 -0500
Message-ID: <9F9D9713-D4A8-4DF0-94CD-81642C218168@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <42e8ed1730104685a0823900d6abba6a@rew09926dag03b.domain1.systemhost.net>
References: <20150409012839.12369.88541.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <42e8ed1730104685a0823900d6abba6a@rew09926dag03b.domain1.systemhost.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.1r5084)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lmap/t-xVrlg7wJupYeBYtqoqN3xPE2Q>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 07:32:16 -0700
Cc: dromasca@avaya.com, lmap-chairs@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, lmap@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [lmap] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-lmap-framework-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance <lmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:lmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 14:21:07 -0000
On 14 Apr 2015, at 8:58, philip.eardley@bt.com wrote: > Ben, > Thanks for the comments. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: lmap [mailto:lmap-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ben Campbell >> Sent: 09 April 2015 02:29 >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> COMMENT: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Section 1, paragraph starting with "Broadly speaking there are two >> types of Measurement Method. " >> >> s / Method / Methods > > Can we leave this one for discussion with the RFC Editor? > Doing a bit of googling, there's no clear rule. In UK English I think > that 'there are two types of method /dog /apple' would be much more > usual than methods/ dogs /apples. You may be right for American English, too :-) (I read "two...method[s]", but you wrote "two types...". My bad.) > >> >> Figures: >> >> Several figures that start at the top of the page have the first line >> out of alignment. >> >> Figure numbers might be useful. (For example, had there been numbers >> I >> could have referenced the figures with the alignment problem :-) ) >> > > Figures now aligned. > Figure numbering - will leave to RFC editor if they want them. Sure I usually suggest them if there's more than a couple of figures, because it makes it easier for people to talk about (and reference) the figures. But to my knowledge they are not required, and the RFC editor will probably not add them. /Ben
- [lmap] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Ben Campbell
- Re: [lmap] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-i… philip.eardley
- Re: [lmap] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-i… Ben Campbell