Re: [lmap] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-lmap-framework-12: (with COMMENT)
<philip.eardley@bt.com> Tue, 14 April 2015 13:58 UTC
Return-Path: <philip.eardley@bt.com>
X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C291A00FD; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 06:58:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.611
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.611 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dA9oqjdXF5QG; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 06:58:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpb1.bt.com (smtpb1.bt.com [62.7.242.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95C811A0119; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 06:58:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EVHUB04-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net (193.113.108.172) by EVMED04-UKBR.bt.com (10.216.161.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 14:58:39 +0100
Received: from rew09926dag03d.domain1.systemhost.net (10.55.202.30) by EVHUB04-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net (193.113.108.172) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 14:58:43 +0100
Received: from rew09926dag03b.domain1.systemhost.net (10.55.202.22) by rew09926dag03d.domain1.systemhost.net (10.55.202.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.995.29; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 14:58:42 +0100
Received: from rew09926dag03b.domain1.systemhost.net ([fe80::d514:fe50:560c:401e]) by rew09926dag03b.domain1.systemhost.net ([fe80::d514:fe50:560c:401e%12]) with mapi id 15.00.0995.031; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 14:58:42 +0100
From: philip.eardley@bt.com
To: ben@nostrum.com, iesg@ietf.org
Thread-Topic: [lmap] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-lmap-framework-12: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHQcu56JbBOfgC/mUCpIw0Umrr32J1MhIug
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:58:42 +0000
Message-ID: <42e8ed1730104685a0823900d6abba6a@rew09926dag03b.domain1.systemhost.net>
References: <20150409012839.12369.88541.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150409012839.12369.88541.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.55.202.233]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lmap/dODLW8QRzZXu-A13tyvZuhF4sDg>
Cc: dromasca@avaya.com, lmap-chairs@ietf.org, lmap@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [lmap] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-lmap-framework-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance <lmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:lmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:58:48 -0000
Ben, Thanks for the comments. > -----Original Message----- > From: lmap [mailto:lmap-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ben Campbell > Sent: 09 April 2015 02:29 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Section 1, paragraph starting with "Broadly speaking there are two > types of Measurement Method. " > > s / Method / Methods Can we leave this one for discussion with the RFC Editor? Doing a bit of googling, there's no clear rule. In UK English I think that 'there are two types of method /dog /apple' would be much more usual than methods/ dogs /apples. > > Figures: > > Several figures that start at the top of the page have the first line > out of alignment. > > Figure numbers might be useful. (For example, had there been numbers I > could have referenced the figures with the alignment problem :-) ) > Figures now aligned. Figure numbering - will leave to RFC editor if they want them.
- [lmap] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Ben Campbell
- Re: [lmap] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-i… philip.eardley
- Re: [lmap] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-i… Ben Campbell