IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption call for "IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions" - draft-ginsberg-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00

"Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com> Wed, 25 April 2018 20:34 UTC

Return-Path: <ginsberg@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67BB612D7ED for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 13:34:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JMmOYE4HptGQ for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 13:34:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9839812D77E for <lsr@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 13:34:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=15686; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1524688465; x=1525898065; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=/PvE/DGN9EfQj37JJaRHeQYU8gq9Lw3zEoRMif9kmcY=; b=V1lAf9wejBltuLbhCaRI9FBqKUEpsxmeBsYWp5xxc1iwQpTNbB62m8IQ ssypavH3CHjSXN7tfNRLroLS0KW4pgaXIX1Nxxg0kenriwvboVtBt/eyo zh1HaIsQVRK1gJROvPHjaA2Kn4TbHYEbFRZ2F6aZbUgZAT1QRNWgOrBve Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AuAQAe5eBa/4cNJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYJNdmEXYygKg2CIAox3gXSBD44ehG+BeAuEbAIagnEhNBgBAgEBAQEBAQJsKIUiAQEBAQMdBgpcAgEIEQMBAQEkBAMCAgIwFAkIAgQBEgiEI2SoA4IciEGCRYgQgVQ/gQ6DDIUKCQYQgkqCVAKIGYhXhxMIAo47gTyDX4c9kBACERMBgSQBHDiBUnAVO4JDCYI/jgZvjn+BGAEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,327,1520899200"; d="scan'208,217";a="386423649"
Received: from alln-core-2.cisco.com ([173.36.13.135]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Apr 2018 20:34:24 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-012.cisco.com (xch-aln-012.cisco.com [173.36.7.22]) by alln-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w3PKYOxE012203 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <lsr@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 20:34:24 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-001.cisco.com (173.36.7.11) by XCH-ALN-012.cisco.com (173.36.7.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 15:34:23 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-001.cisco.com ([173.36.7.11]) by XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com ([173.36.7.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 15:34:23 -0500
From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: LSR WG Adoption call for "IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions" - draft-ginsberg-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00
Thread-Index: AQHT0DfP9V4jKsaH1EuzX1B5k8E/AKQR57/QgABfiAD//8G98A==
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 20:34:23 +0000
Message-ID: <642f880cfd2e4014810198444205a2a1@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com>
References: <6C4A9D96-579C-4FC4-81C5-F6DBAC61C1BE@cisco.com> <04086934dc41461b9458850686154425@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com> <6D817EE3-413B-41B1-9029-C4980970CF96@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <6D817EE3-413B-41B1-9029-C4980970CF96@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.64.56]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_642f880cfd2e4014810198444205a2a1XCHALN001ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/1L3KalCpnIrdNHdo6epHcGXWHt4>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption call for "IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions" - draft-ginsberg-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 20:34:28 -0000

Acee –

Thanx.
New version has been submitted – pending WG chair approval to be posted.

   Les


From: Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2018 12:17 PM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsberg@cisco.com>; lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: LSR WG Adoption call for "IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions" - draft-ginsberg-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00

Hi Les,
Yes – please reissue the draft using the agreed upon naming convention.
Thanks,
Acee

From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com<mailto:ginsberg@cisco.com>>
Date: Wednesday, April 25, 2018 at 2:37 PM
To: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com<mailto:acee@cisco.com>>, "lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>" <lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>>
Subject: RE: LSR WG Adoption call for "IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions" - draft-ginsberg-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00

WG chairs –

It has been more than 2 weeks since adoption call was initiated and support has been expressed on the list – w no objections.
Can we consider WG adoption complete?
Can I issue a WG version of the draft?

Thanx.

    Les



From: Lsr <lsr-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:lsr-bounces@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2018 12:20 PM
To: lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
Subject: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption call for "IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions" - draft-ginsberg-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00

This draft simply fixes a problem in RFC 7810 that resulted in an incompatibility issue with implementations. Given the simplicity of this document, I’d like to have an abbreviated WG adoption call of one week. Please indicate your support or objections to this document by April 17th, 2018.

Thanks,
Acee

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email