Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption call for "IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions" - draft-ginsberg-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00

"Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com> Wed, 25 April 2018 18:37 UTC

Return-Path: <ginsberg@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA6D9127869 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 11:37:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B2i1jCgpl1A4 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 11:37:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2922127698 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 11:37:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7660; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1524681453; x=1525891053; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=YHCmaRH6MVuCIa/97ZRAx/Q+/K7RcVPLiVPCIU0e7vs=; b=Y6yaUVMOdMIrvkxFlBoBHkIDWUOUywnk9pLRd9e+Z/bPzowm+sjOUPGE Vh5igTTgQNolEPw3RA4fh1MWzGExzRee6sJE66djOmhdpqPDjozLU7VoX H/Tmxgr664bBSGzgGQWYBQ4f2wLMgBLpgmKx43IsfJa6j4Z8NHAV6IUE6 c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AuAQBOyuBa/5tdJa1bGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYJNdmEXYygKg2CIAox4gXSBD44ehG+BeAuEbAIagnEhNBgBAgEBAQEBAQJsKIUiAQEBAQMdBgpcAgEIEQQBASQHAgICMB0IAgQBEgiEI2SoI4IciEOCRYgQgVQ/gQ6DDIUKD4JaglQCkHCHEwgCjjuBPINfhz2QEAIREwGBJAEcOIFScBU7gkOCSI4Gb45/gRgBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,327,1520899200"; d="scan'208,217";a="104919234"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Apr 2018 18:37:33 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-014.cisco.com (xch-rcd-014.cisco.com [173.37.102.24]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w3PIbWAN013892 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <lsr@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 18:37:32 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-001.cisco.com (173.36.7.11) by XCH-RCD-014.cisco.com (173.37.102.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 13:37:32 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-001.cisco.com ([173.36.7.11]) by XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com ([173.36.7.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 13:37:32 -0500
From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: LSR WG Adoption call for "IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions" - draft-ginsberg-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00
Thread-Index: AQHT0DfP9V4jKsaH1EuzX1B5k8E/AKQR57/Q
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 18:37:32 +0000
Message-ID: <04086934dc41461b9458850686154425@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com>
References: <6C4A9D96-579C-4FC4-81C5-F6DBAC61C1BE@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <6C4A9D96-579C-4FC4-81C5-F6DBAC61C1BE@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.64.56]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_04086934dc41461b9458850686154425XCHALN001ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/1uxt3oKBm3tem-3h7Y9kWOGR2Y0>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption call for "IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions" - draft-ginsberg-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 18:37:36 -0000

WG chairs –

It has been more than 2 weeks since adoption call was initiated and support has been expressed on the list – w no objections.
Can we consider WG adoption complete?
Can I issue a WG version of the draft?

Thanx.

    Les



From: Lsr <lsr-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2018 12:20 PM
To: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption call for "IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions" - draft-ginsberg-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00

This draft simply fixes a problem in RFC 7810 that resulted in an incompatibility issue with implementations. Given the simplicity of this document, I’d like to have an abbreviated WG adoption call of one week. Please indicate your support or objections to this document by April 17th, 2018.

Thanks,
Acee