Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption call for "IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions" - draft-ginsberg-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Wed, 25 April 2018 19:16 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF85129502 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:16:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GjLmH3BiUm7I for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:16:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 901F712702E for <lsr@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:16:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=11632; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1524683806; x=1525893406; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=Dp1n/RQo1AAViCurOVBnInk1ZVISrnRIMML5S3NlgBY=; b=gDEEKZ8QZEnI4AitELWP6Hsh0U+HYDwwzrCg/gTraExpmrIjidgXA4nw lWAK+M6igVjHu8J6JeZUeXcKMN/PVfNV3iUk5zhUVc0yy8+hw4MZw4UTU /TxNkB0jecG0NoQNfm8+zYPVUHfxGgb/CVrOAHVDUkWxm6meDoPHeaHjC Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AzAQDx0uBa/5ldJa1bGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYJNdmEXYygKg2CIAox5gVMhgQ+OHoRvgXgLhGwCGoJxITQYAQIBAQEBAQECbCiFIgEBAQEDHQZmAgEIEQMBAQEkBwICAjAdCAIEARKEK2SoF4IciESCRYgQghOBDiQMglyFCgkGglowgiQCiBmIV4cTCAKOQ4E0g1+HPZAQAhETAYEkARw4gVJwFTsqAYIYCYI/jgZvjn+BGAEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,327,1520899200"; d="scan'208,217";a="105294399"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Apr 2018 19:16:45 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-001.cisco.com (xch-rtp-001.cisco.com [64.101.220.141]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w3PJGjNk029265 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <lsr@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 19:16:45 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-001.cisco.com (64.101.220.141) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 15:16:44 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 15:16:44 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: LSR WG Adoption call for "IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions" - draft-ginsberg-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00
Thread-Index: AQHT3MR5ccvHMrFQ80+80DEnoT04fqQR2lwA
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 19:16:44 +0000
Message-ID: <6D817EE3-413B-41B1-9029-C4980970CF96@cisco.com>
References: <6C4A9D96-579C-4FC4-81C5-F6DBAC61C1BE@cisco.com> <04086934dc41461b9458850686154425@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <04086934dc41461b9458850686154425@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.41.32.62]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_6D817EE3413B41B19029C4980970CF96ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/nRvYSay4J_7GRqZdkCEIiEB4ef4>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption call for "IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions" - draft-ginsberg-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 19:16:48 -0000

Hi Les,
Yes – please reissue the draft using the agreed upon naming convention.
Thanks,
Acee

From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
Date: Wednesday, April 25, 2018 at 2:37 PM
To: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: LSR WG Adoption call for "IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions" - draft-ginsberg-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00

WG chairs –

It has been more than 2 weeks since adoption call was initiated and support has been expressed on the list – w no objections.
Can we consider WG adoption complete?
Can I issue a WG version of the draft?

Thanx.

    Les



From: Lsr <lsr-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2018 12:20 PM
To: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption call for "IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions" - draft-ginsberg-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00

This draft simply fixes a problem in RFC 7810 that resulted in an incompatibility issue with implementations. Given the simplicity of this document, I’d like to have an abbreviated WG adoption call of one week. Please indicate your support or objections to this document by April 17th, 2018.

Thanks,
Acee