IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE discovery" (Corrected)

<daniel@olddog.co.uk> Tue, 27 November 2018 20:43 UTC

Return-Path: <dk@danielking.net>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E486126F72 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 12:43:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.357
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.357 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-1.459, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=danielking-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mGfFNz9rrdnQ for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 12:43:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x434.google.com (mail-wr1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::434]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EF5C124408 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 12:43:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-x434.google.com with SMTP id j2so24127552wrw.1 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 12:43:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=danielking-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=sender:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:thread-index:content-language; bh=C+D+i3zTsr5uQK1MKoywgYrf5xnbpfVR3bqV+1FoI6s=; b=Mm5l0noBcf5sdo6AU7Cbo5zVZyMMRJ5eeCyDGTd6H7JNxpIjtso0UKPqn5pNmlZ0V4 0U7MvtcpK7qWV74xjBlsl2EaqYLsEVKtlOJSsifJ4xnClmw0JuPQTm0hXJi/H8+LIkCR lpvDLQ4Vh6J4IkKhHNYO4kz/uFViZ1hGgvkPUswWkiqBYUoQLWjTt7jbOGR4dPtWEVqc WpeMd7RGDQg6l91dKiyYnfBQJzEK++SfQI90SwdufJYD3z0Wqtbz24H3AzJqqndAQnaV vGMn/8BFxX6Bpt+zEDt+8Z5+L3nyIw4J60/IAHitVy0OEIDJlV1q89qXiMCgq6i6c/rT ApIg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject :date:message-id:mime-version:thread-index:content-language; bh=C+D+i3zTsr5uQK1MKoywgYrf5xnbpfVR3bqV+1FoI6s=; b=F+Uk1ExaRGsd/yO2ACz38tKZExctX4WFgfVelyHGogztsqU58YD3WH64m73oVKOzrA wGX9+zruyt/sMmVwrqiYJTPz+CfqhpEZIA5PXshaw01uXDCBpsHdUeC4T+HGnDikVzEl FpNx25NGqFSUobZ4IvpgcmCqRuzi4XidHmTORbyQwaoMEFRzmQc7a32I3y2cYgcVsyYU emS0btrH4lGpbIfcqxCZS89qLtWPg8+yIczDjrTXvbGJOnxZjkaRivfkckO+SLTIt2T0 UI1bn7W+x7RKbfvWI3hcd20CK9LFCjSawHcHyVWWabrPfDZDwpxB429aAQi1e8O1zb3X JDYg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWZqpboeWoHAm8fD65WrY717eCkUYsAZe/oB/YFb5wlASqBDr+xq 3jBoeIJGSwL4GhalJI2iQivxSr/Lgw0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/VddhJq6QBBmqSErtxOCzDyBCj+dZ1lc3a21dMS7n80a4Z2r7Ka4ph33dz9B8DPJaEYNXf+3g==
X-Received: by 2002:adf:84e4:: with SMTP id 91mr28467183wrg.237.1543351383595; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 12:43:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from INARA ([82.138.197.10]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l13sm495121wmb.27.2018.11.27.12.43.02 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 27 Nov 2018 12:43:02 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Daniel King <dk@danielking.net>
X-Google-Original-Sender: "Daniel King" <dk@danielking.net>
From: daniel@olddog.co.uk
To: lsr@ietf.org
Cc: draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support@ietf.org
References: <8504C66D-7395-4B58-A9B4-C413B6BC0DD9@cisco.com> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9B1425B9@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9B1425B9@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 20:43:01 -0000
Message-ID: <001501d48691$ca8b8c70$5fa2a550$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0016_01D48691.CA8DD660"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQKSWy1wvOxMrmML85wt6ZLbipQ/BgIzQ+LTo9bSSiA=
Content-Language: en-gb
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/1Y_UxVZncFDB9-i7ne1eiAPIasM>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE discovery" (Corrected)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 20:43:08 -0000

Hi Acee, all. 

 

No, I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

 

BR, Dan. 

 

发件人: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:acee@cisco.com] 
发送时间: 2018年11月16日 11:59
收件人: draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support
抄送: lsr@ietf.org <mailto:lsr@ietf.org> ; pce@ietf.org <mailto:pce@ietf.org> 
主题: Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE discovery" (Corrected)

 

Authors – Reminder that you need to explicitly reply to this poll. 

 

From: Lsr <lsr-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:lsr-bounces@ietf.org> > on behalf of Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com <mailto:acee@cisco.com> >
Date: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 at 3:02 PM
To: draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support <draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support@ietf.org <mailto:draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support@ietf.org> >
Cc: "lsr@ietf.org <mailto:lsr@ietf.org> " <lsr@ietf.org <mailto:lsr@ietf.org> >
Subject: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE discovery" (Corrected)

 

Authors, 

 

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support?

 

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

 

There are currently no IPR disclosures against draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support.

    

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the LSR WG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and contributor.

    

If you are on the LSR WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

 

Thanks,

Acee

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email