IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE discovery" (Corrected)

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Fri, 16 November 2018 03:58 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F52E1298C5; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 19:58:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.969
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.969 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.47, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ujWp_ydhNe0T; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 19:58:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABA16124D68; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 19:58:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=9108; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1542340734; x=1543550334; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=6O6eWS+vtRZ+9XxiNcfcb1jIFNMbB/4kspH0FxOVGG0=; b=ZpOCCz8d/OOS1ATAtEPq2RzhgvNnIdJ/Od7CDZFzK5TD3IU9jxCXYDh4 oJRRdjp6XBh9U3VuKKPNP/pknrDUATsJ9oDcGfTegrKSljgU/3dQH2jT9 xheHUlLgJXH8/1CR0qAp/v0lwbjgj+arcSztv3w8pa809dQnFAHLV94ME k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AEAADKP+5b/5BdJa1kGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEHAgEBAQGBUQUBAQEBCwGBDXZmgQInCoNuiBiNYyWRYoVUFIFmCwEBhGwZgzkiNAkNAQMBAQIBAQJtKIU8AQYjSwYFEgEIEQMBAiQHAgQwHQoEDgWDIQGBHWSnSYEviiSMBReBf4ERJwwTgkyESwESATYJgmQxgiYCiQmFbpByCQKRJRiBWIUHihuXaAIRFIEnHzhkcXAVOyoBgkGCUI4KQTEMixmBH4EfAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,238,1539648000"; d="scan'208,217";a="480942981"
Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Nov 2018 03:58:53 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (xch-rtp-011.cisco.com [64.101.220.151]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id wAG3wrEV005041 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 16 Nov 2018 03:58:53 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (64.101.220.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 22:58:52 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 22:58:52 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support <draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support@ietf.org>
CC: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE discovery" (Corrected)
Thread-Index: AQHUfWCwZxPxIPRHZ06TGA8uHrbDsg==
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 03:58:52 +0000
Message-ID: <8504C66D-7395-4B58-A9B4-C413B6BC0DD9@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_8504C66D73954B58A9B4C413B6BC0DD9ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 64.101.220.151, xch-rtp-011.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-8.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/5LbZji36VU5M569fYCOkUm392u0>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE discovery" (Corrected)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 03:58:57 -0000

Authors – Reminder that you need to explicitly reply to this poll.

From: Lsr <lsr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>
Date: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 at 3:02 PM
To: draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support <draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support@ietf.org>
Cc: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Subject: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE discovery" (Corrected)

Authors,

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support?

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

There are currently no IPR disclosures against draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the LSR WG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and contributor.

If you are on the LSR WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

Thanks,
Acee

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email