IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE discovery" (Corrected)

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Fri, 16 November 2018 13:04 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6247E124408; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 05:04:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.968
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.968 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.47, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, LOTS_OF_MONEY=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tn5zoQIiAP_V; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 05:04:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5A8912426A; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 05:04:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=16920; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1542373479; x=1543583079; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=/6kberAkSnBgt5DxHcLHTpNf98AfJG0oXQgG2vk5jSs=; b=C9dQpanI3PSFxdiveTH4/DC5CIgKAdTI0PpA9SgJ4CAKebucqwOtlroy 7pM5bXPAvrTcj1/m7nplmj0xpji/o7RWH+MHSTrKuitNB63pm8B/+pOYH eaplrUNAxAUcMHDBXIoOx66cZsaWG27Cyv8VqFVQjE6/x0HXFeNXRUq7v w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ADAAAQv+5b/5ldJa1jGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBUQQBAQEBAQsBgQ12ZoECJwqDbogYi3yCDZFihVQUgRADUwsBASOESQIXgz0iNAkNAQMBAQIBAQJtHAyFPAEBAQQjBEcGBRACAQYCDgMDAQIkBAMCAgIwFAkIAgQOBYMhAYEdZA+MJZtQfDOELQGFbgEEDYt4F4F/gREnH4JMgxsCgS4BEgE2CRaCTjGCJgKJCYVukHMJAoZ4ii0YgViFB4objTWKNAIRFIEnHzg0MHFwFTsqAYJBglCDOIpSQTEMixuBH4EfAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,240,1539648000"; d="scan'208,217";a="472862062"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Nov 2018 13:04:37 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (xch-rtp-012.cisco.com [64.101.220.152]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id wAGD4aje029703 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 16 Nov 2018 13:04:36 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (64.101.220.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 08:04:35 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 08:04:35 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>, draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support <draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support@ietf.org>
CC: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE discovery" (Corrected)
Thread-Index: AQHUfWCwZxPxIPRHZ06TGA8uHrbDsqVR+fLQgABlIwA=
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 13:04:35 +0000
Message-ID: <07D91656-4A0C-40DA-A6B9-19E669C89C20@cisco.com>
References: <8504C66D-7395-4B58-A9B4-C413B6BC0DD9@cisco.com> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9B135640@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9B135640@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_07D916564A0C40DAA6B919E669C89C20ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 64.101.220.152, xch-rtp-012.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/LpiJDaaWdIgFNDIofxv4bwclMCs>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE discovery" (Corrected)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 13:04:42 -0000

Hi Qin,
This looks more like applying a mechanism analogous to BGP capabilities negotiation to PCC<->PCE. However, please check and file the necessary IPR disclosure if applicable.
Thanks,
Acee

From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
Date: Friday, November 16, 2018 at 2:44 AM
To: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>, draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support <draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support@ietf.org>
Cc: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE discovery" (Corrected)

It seems there was one relevant IPR
https://patents.google.com/patent/US8127129B2/en<javascript:;>
but I am not sure it is applicable. I will consult with our IPR people to check on this.

-Qin
发件人: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:acee@cisco.com]
发送时间: 2018年11月16日 11:59
收件人: draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support
抄送: lsr@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org
主题: Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE discovery" (Corrected)

Authors – Reminder that you need to explicitly reply to this poll.

From: Lsr <lsr-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:lsr-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com<mailto:acee@cisco.com>>
Date: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 at 3:02 PM
To: draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support <draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support@ietf.org<mailto:draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support@ietf.org>>
Cc: "lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>" <lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>>
Subject: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE discovery" (Corrected)

Authors,

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support?

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

There are currently no IPR disclosures against draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the LSR WG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and contributor.

If you are on the LSR WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

Thanks,
Acee

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email