[Lsr] 答复: 答复: WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 + IPR poll.

+1. 

Support to start the adoption poll on both drafts.

-Jie

> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Lsr [mailto:lsr-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Aijun Wang
> 发送时间: 2019年2月14日 10:38
> 收件人: 'Christian Hopps' <chopps@chopps.org>; lsr@ietf.org
> 抄送: lsr-chairs@ietf.org; lsr-ads@ietf.org
> 主题: [Lsr] 答复: WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 + IPR
> poll.
> 
> Hi, Christian:
> 
> Supports for the adoption of two drafts at the same time, in which
> one(draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02) focuses on the centralized mode and
> the other(draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction-01) focuses on the distributed
> mode.
> 
> The centralized mode for is one straightforward way to realize the flooding
> reduction, and I admire Tony Li give his solution first. But from the
> consideration of solution robustness, the distributed mode may be more
> promising.
> My consideration for distributed mode is that it should not cover only the
> algorithm, more contents need to be standardized in future. Huaimo has one
> good start point for distributed mode, and he also gives abundant thoughts
> for the centralized mode that the current version of
> draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 has not covered yet.
> 
> Proposal for the name of two drafts may be
> draft-ietf-lsr-flooding-reduction-centralized-mode and
> draft-ietf-lsr-flooding-reduction-distributed-mode.
> 
> 
> Best Regards.
> 
> Aijun Wang
> Network R&D and Operation Support Department China Telecom Corporation
> Limited Beijing Research Institute,Beijing, China.
> 
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Christian Hopps [mailto:chopps@chopps.org]
> 发送时间: 2019年2月11日 18:45
> 收件人: lsr@ietf.org
> 抄送: lsr-chairs@ietf.org; lsr-ads@ietf.org; chopps@chopps.org
> 主题: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 + IPR poll.
> 
> 
> Hi Folks,
> 
> We are starting a 2 week adoption call on draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02.
> 
> The aim of this document is to describe the problem space and standardize a
> way to signal dynamic flooding information. It does not standardize any
> specific algorithm for flooding topology creation.
> 
> Authors please respond indicating if you are aware of any IPR related to
> this work.
> 
> We also have another draft (draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction-01) that started
> as a distributed flooding topology algorithm and morphed into that plus
> competing ideas on signaling of flooding topology information. The intent
> after adoption of draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 is two-fold. One, the WG
> can discuss adding any signaling ideas from this work to the adopted
> signaling draft (with proper attribution given as appropriate), and two, for
> the authors of draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction-01 to publish a new document
> without the signaling portion and instead focus on their flooding topology
> algorithm. This new focused document can be considered in parallel along
> with the other algorithm work that has been proposed.
> 
> Flooding topology creation is seen as a hard problem for which we don't
> expect a one-size-fits-all solution. Taking the steps outlined above will
> help us move forward on the solutions.
> 
> Thanks,
> Chris & Acee.
> LSR WG Chairs.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr