Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 + IPR poll.

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Mon, 11 February 2019 13:23 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2117130E8A; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 05:23:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p23_wzmDg__9; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 05:23:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3D6212D4EA; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 05:23:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2440; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1549891383; x=1551100983; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=x66L1ZfMOaLcExAQmGtkbEne6GlobwD0Olt3ryFdwbw=; b=FAdXbvifntqGy+Ncdm9uoOHNM2Q55a8ck44T8hLK/ndTzhOJVgLqy1mX AkpNbZ1Vho3iohJxspN8ioAkIIbS8Jcst4gQn1zoYhNJOZ5DqXr1q+mrg sVWr8Kr1hP6289sU5sdgipwPPsAW2iE41knEmRmuxBb5HcYWk5TtS8aQQ c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AHAADDdmFc/5BdJa1jGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEHAgEBAQGBUgQBAQEBCwGCA4FqJwqDepQHgWiYOIF7CgEBAYRsAheDKCI1CA0BAwEBAgEBAm0ohUsGHQYRRRACAQgODAImAgICMBUQAgQBDQUbgwmCAqkwgS+FRIRkgQuLOBeBf4E4DBOCTIUBgwkxgiYCox8JApJOGYFthUuLKIlkCUaRYgIRFIEnIQMzgVZwFWUBgkGQXUExi0OBHwEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.58,358,1544486400"; d="scan'208";a="298086526"
Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Feb 2019 13:22:56 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com (xch-rtp-015.cisco.com [64.101.220.155]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x1BDMuPN024685 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 11 Feb 2019 13:22:56 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 08:22:55 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 08:22:55 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
CC: "lsr-ads@ietf.org" <lsr-ads@ietf.org>, "lsr-chairs@ietf.org" <lsr-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 + IPR poll.
Thread-Index: AQHUwfcqvpixdtvexEKB5NX4sukjbKXaldsA
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 13:22:55 +0000
Message-ID: <988989F9-525D-4ED5-9001-BE9B1B6E8901@cisco.com>
References: <sa6lg2md2ok.fsf@chopps.org>
In-Reply-To: <sa6lg2md2ok.fsf@chopps.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.70.188]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <6346CBDD8D71F149955506EB40326B11@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 64.101.220.155, xch-rtp-015.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-8.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/GPlhrHZlWIqiFGpUljpnI39EftI>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 + IPR poll.
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 13:23:05 -0000

Speaking as a WG member:

I support adoption of draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 as infrastructure for flooding reduction mechanisms based on a separate flooding topology. Work on individual flooding reduction/topology determination algorithms can proceed in separate drafts. 

Thanks,
Acee

On 2/11/19, 5:47 AM, "Christian Hopps" <chopps@chopps.org> wrote:

    
    Hi Folks,
    
    We are starting a 2 week adoption call on draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02.
    
    The aim of this document is to describe the problem space and standardize a way to signal dynamic flooding information. It does not standardize any specific algorithm for flooding topology creation.
    
    Authors please respond indicating if you are aware of any IPR related to this work.
    
    We also have another draft (draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction-01) that started as a distributed flooding topology algorithm and morphed into that plus competing ideas on signaling of flooding topology information. The intent after adoption of draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 is two-fold. One, the WG can discuss adding any signaling ideas from this work to the adopted signaling draft (with proper attribution given as appropriate), and two, for the authors of draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction-01 to publish a new document without the signaling portion and instead focus on their flooding topology algorithm. This new focused document can be considered in parallel along with the other algorithm work that has been proposed.
    
    Flooding topology creation is seen as a hard problem for which we don't expect a one-size-fits-all solution. Taking the steps outlined above will help us move forward on the solutions.
    
    Thanks,
    Chris & Acee.
    LSR WG Chairs.