Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 + IPR poll.

Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com> Mon, 11 February 2019 20:21 UTC

Return-Path: <ppsenak@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B66131184; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 12:21:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sBk3cKkunbBq; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 12:21:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79FFF13118A; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 12:21:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1688; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1549916473; x=1551126073; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=W0Ukfca0hNJnale2fNBYTlUWcQCKQvGpkmpuC2lOyV8=; b=gb14fHSK/svqk3yTAbkNgQQDKPpMSzDXjEBSaPLMBnjczbsxkHgIpy1L Tk/6W/ficnJ/Vyc2ncyj17Ct9YimmWwEM21PCbK8oEGNIBJJhtfeozrsz 5EN676F62EJnzsbq6LtNO6GIggeD2WyknM6xN/BUUX8tJfFMrMEYrg9JW Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0B0AABW2GFc/xbLJq1jGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEHAgEBAQGBZYJrcRInjH2Mci2aDg0YC4RJAoNhOBIBAwEBAgEBAm0cDIVLAQEEAQEbGzYLEAsOCi4nMAYBDAYCAQEXgwkBggEPrA6FRIRnBYxagUA/gTiCa4MeAQGHQQKRBIYri3AJkkoGGYFthUuDGIgQiWQJRpIJgV0hgVYzGggbFTuCbIsehUA+AzCOLgEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.58,360,1544486400"; d="scan'208";a="9961067"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Feb 2019 20:21:10 +0000
Received: from [10.60.140.54] (ams-ppsenak-nitro5.cisco.com [10.60.140.54]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1BKL9gj011724; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 20:21:09 GMT
To: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
References: <sa6lg2md2ok.fsf@chopps.org>
Cc: "lsr-chairs@ietf.org" <lsr-chairs@ietf.org>, "lsr-ads@ietf.org" <lsr-ads@ietf.org>
From: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <7ec2bad5-884a-3b12-161f-553126bdcc2a@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:21:09 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <sa6lg2md2ok.fsf@chopps.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.60.140.54, ams-ppsenak-nitro5.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-1.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/WxWAwlFeaEDu-EYVh1MM-THwrGA>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 + IPR poll.
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 20:21:16 -0000

Hi Chris,

support as coauthor.

Not aware of any IPR at this point.

thanks,
Peter

On 11/02/2019 11:44 , Christian Hopps wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> We are starting a 2 week adoption call on draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02.
>
> The aim of this document is to describe the problem space and
> standardize a way to signal dynamic flooding information. It does not
> standardize any specific algorithm for flooding topology creation.
>
> Authors please respond indicating if you are aware of any IPR related to
> this work.
>
> We also have another draft (draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction-01) that
> started as a distributed flooding topology algorithm and morphed into
> that plus competing ideas on signaling of flooding topology information.
> The intent after adoption of draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 is
> two-fold. One, the WG can discuss adding any signaling ideas from this
> work to the adopted signaling draft (with proper attribution given as
> appropriate), and two, for the authors of
> draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction-01 to publish a new document without the
> signaling portion and instead focus on their flooding topology
> algorithm. This new focused document can be considered in parallel along
> with the other algorithm work that has been proposed.
>
> Flooding topology creation is seen as a hard problem for which we don't
> expect a one-size-fits-all solution. Taking the steps outlined above
> will help us move forward on the solutions.
>
> Thanks,
> Chris & Acee.
> LSR WG Chairs.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
>