Re: [Lsr] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: (with COMMENT)

Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com> Thu, 21 May 2020 07:51 UTC

Return-Path: <ppsenak@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 074ED3A0AAA; Thu, 21 May 2020 00:51:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TG_InzKn8Qz3; Thu, 21 May 2020 00:51:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 598DA3A0AA7; Thu, 21 May 2020 00:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1850; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1590047478; x=1591257078; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=N13/c3gM9lxqEtbP6895tMCGdFf8JanfcM9cUa6XC0g=; b=A3xcbrXCktkf/882rl6mR6UbPLYCrQ2Wh9I+WD98Xp4ZxWWP28nzYm99 HJ3NGNTAc+NrlLu+1KERVh0H0WwZvC2vlR99eq0lPoap+Gy/34PzIXt45 hsiYCAHBmmkHpQ9yyhIpRwB9w6/BLuiuRrcqihgETBNWgUNE09Z1eVcwu Y=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,417,1583193600"; d="scan'208";a="26342481"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 21 May 2020 07:51:15 +0000
Received: from [10.60.140.51] (ams-ppsenak-nitro2.cisco.com [10.60.140.51]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 04L7pEvv011283; Thu, 21 May 2020 07:51:15 GMT
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc@ietf.org, lsr-chairs@ietf.org, lsr@ietf.org, Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com
References: <159000466381.16821.994893511549433009@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <d98d82da-c2a7-4d77-d2ab-c2e74f5fdb9d@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 09:51:13 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <159000466381.16821.994893511549433009@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.60.140.51, ams-ppsenak-nitro2.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/FfW-zhumo_E8znOGMZPeOslBYFI>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 07:51:20 -0000

Hi Alissa,

On 20/05/2020 21:57, Alissa Cooper via Datatracker wrote:
> Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I wasn't clear on where the  thread ended up from the Gen-ART review, but I'm
> nevertheless suggesting some text below to resolve the main sticking point.
> 
> OLD
> If the router supports ELs on all of its interfaces, it SHOULD advertise the
> ELC with every local host prefix it advertises in OSPF.
> 
> NEW
> If the router supports ELs on all of its interfaces, it SHOULD advertise the
> ELC with every local host prefix it advertises in OSPF. The absence of these
> advertisements implies that advertisement of the ELC is not supported.

I added the suggested text, plus I added "OSPF" at the end. So the text is:

"If the router supports ELs on all of its interfaces, it SHOULD 
advertise the ELC with every local host prefix it advertises in OSPF. 
The absence of these advertisements implies that advertisement of the 
ELC is not supported in OSPF."

I added similar text to ISIS ELC draft.

thanks,
Peter

> 
> Not sure if that matches the intent though.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>