IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] LSR: Using DSCP for path/topology selection Q

Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com> Fri, 16 November 2018 06:56 UTC

Return-Path: <tony1athome@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B526130DC2 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 22:56:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LwJeRaAPVOHq for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 22:56:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42a.google.com (mail-pf1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE7F3124D68 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 22:56:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id c72so6254720pfc.6 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 22:56:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=1opmByVJa9kVO1moCezudA3tFvxY0m6aAjkV6CmsyQw=; b=vKlrB7njKE6rZpnK3y4zRtv8uPPppPtVY+DFfOt0hYorQNtJU2m4kZ2Wi5cLgB39TV FI6kcy84DcOmtRsPSw2LOJOGAbkLDdstxNQtbX9R8TJ5mgrE0mhunB35Qyf0YrGIAUfa TDFja9Iv1yX4A3fJOBRJp4c3WxHiQ+ksRQMi8lVFaqjEzsjnHzYykovIRYO/FmsXB4Fi 24GBMYswxCzHUpFqgEEl37jb5y69tTQJelsuTMHbGaAVQqFCEk+yXxPwrxukY/MZAThV 7ADhy/LztMm553TwtCZgX4oSEvi/sW5dF60XxL+BmpYYKoOUN7ate6h7uSQqDkzFXeTh 3xHQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=1opmByVJa9kVO1moCezudA3tFvxY0m6aAjkV6CmsyQw=; b=rwBQ1jjN1TFVZmatg7eH/HKgwz1L1Kg4rOGhleI7lffz6m+5hyR8IsKa2oORV6NzfA daTcwGyARqH//xg2J6g7416B48FB0IBe8Dt4gJmRzvLaCY1um4flmDJNlKzRW+TBb6qH 9cg90diG6Mh6BRO4cOkyaN/uEQo2bkolMR+BPeO0SNXVsZ6bRvMnqxr6ubk4dI8+vJfa BcZQbVL6xe4NSMjH2Z9aLQqLtUlYixaeIbr/gC0m+rJf/ApnmfbGc/5zX2IkcJ1k+shL m+1I/cDsMnlgG1LOFECx8QSZ+cM4UOP2dxrWua06+DvD2jdDwpdPbitD/jhO4JtG7vc+ LZQg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gJSbr3HudtlKTQUSuglGpuLQTV3AprQhX6NVtJgETxBTyqB1sTc Zq9dEXDiEpJO7zuprFvMB08=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5chTlvsFKrrav39uS58cHWZU1twS2Xh/7vr+1AoYWKD2xwEnQ7MTLdhL/nPckxEQHTVeCgV4g==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:1f4e:: with SMTP id q14mr8525314pgm.88.1542351360108; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 22:56:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.4] (c-73-158-115-137.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.158.115.137]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n23-v6sm51234145pfg.84.2018.11.15.22.55.58 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 15 Nov 2018 22:55:59 -0800 (PST)
From: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <AB0CF38C-2372-42A2-BCD0-B3D0E5692E1E@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_082AD131-6348-4533-AAED-C47FB60FFDE3"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 22:55:56 -0800
In-Reply-To: <5785DD05-7B7E-4AD5-9B9D-D4DB80B14B16@gmail.com>
Cc: Rob Shakir <rjs@rob.sh>, Les Ginsberg <ginsberg@cisco.com>, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, lsr@ietf.org
To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <20181115022918.pfgcztognsjeb37v@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4085ff6f77b5443ca4de319f9a909a01@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com> <20181115232222.psroxxfwhxrdscns@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CAOj+MMHLO+QjjSh-g4QWBqht3RZKrmxMDjtyhTZQhy0SJ3uojQ@mail.gmail.com> <20181116000708.sl6htsevtalu44wx@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CAHxMRebnhYbwBED8Us2ZR7ikJHHs6VBR6ZLy7cCqfyDJ6XVUAw@mail.gmail.com> <5785DD05-7B7E-4AD5-9B9D-D4DB80B14B16@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/Os6A5bAEhQRpfrpVuvkPmVwHZ9I>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR: Using DSCP for path/topology selection Q
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 06:56:02 -0000


> On Nov 15, 2018, at 8:47 PM, Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> The question is really - what is here to standardize?


There’s a fine architectural BCP here: this is how we are solving problem XYZ.  Please don’t break this.

Tony

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email