Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-11.txt

[Peter Psenak <[e-mail]>]

Hi Chris,

On 15/05/18 10:54 , Christian Hopps wrote:
>
> Hi Les,
>
> I was going over the 2 SR-MSD documents (IS-IS and OSPF) just wondering
> how viable it would be and if we should combine them.
>
> In any case doing the diff highlighted a couple issues in the IS-IS
> version.
>
> Issue: Under both the Node and Link sub-tlv's the MSD type (1?) is not
> actually mentioned, only the "MSD value", if one was pedantic it would
> mean that regardless of the type the value was always the same,
> certainly not what is intended. :)
>
> Issue: The OSPF version adds text about what to do in the presence of
> multiple instances of the same TLV. This highlighted the fact that the
> IS-IS draft doesn't do this, but also doesn't talk about there only
> being 1 allowed.
>
> Maybe Issue: We've got 2 drafts creating the same sub-[-sub]-tlv MSD
> type registry. I fully agree that we should only have one registry, but
> it's interesting that we'll have 2 publications that create and
> reference it. Also, where does this registry go in IANA? There are
> distinct IS-IS, OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 pages that contain the IANA registries
> for each protocol. Should we create a new shared LSR or IGP page? Anyway
> this might be a reason to combine the 2 documents.

there is one already:
https://www.iana.org/assignments/igp-parameters/igp-parameters.xhtml

I agree that we need registry to be created in only one of the documents 
and have other reference it, unless we merge these two drafts.


thanks,
Peter

>
> While somewhat inelegant we could probably avoid any need to re-Last
> Call if the combination was basically a cut and paste operation.
>
> Thanks,
> Chris.
>
> Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <[e-mail]> writes:
>
>> This is a minor editorial revision to make the draft consistent w
>> draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-msd-12.
>>
>>    Les
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Lsr <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of [e-mail]
>>> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 5:49 PM
>>> To: [e-mail]
>>> Cc: [e-mail]
>>> Subject: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-11.txt
>>>
>>>
>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>>> directories.
>>> This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF.
>>>
>>>         Title           : Signaling MSD (Maximum SID Depth) using IS-IS
>>>         Authors         : Jeff Tantsura
>>>                           Uma Chunduri
>>>                           Sam Aldrin
>>>                           Les Ginsberg
>>>     Filename        : draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-11.txt
>>>     Pages           : 9
>>>     Date            : 2018-05-10
>>>
>>> Abstract:
>>>    This document defines a way for an IS-IS Router to advertise multiple
>>>    types of supported Maximum SID Depths (MSDs) at node and/or link
>>>    granularity.  Such advertisements allow entities (e.g., centralized
>>>    controllers) to determine whether a particular SID stack can be
>>>    supported in a given network.  This document only defines one type of
>>>    MSD maximum label imposition, but defines an encoding that can
>>>    support other MSD types.
>>>
>>>
>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd/
>>>
>>> There are also htmlized versions available at:
>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-11
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-
>>>
>>> 11
>>>
>>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-11
>>>
>>>
>>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>>> submission
>>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>>
>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Lsr mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lsr mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
> .
>