Re: [Lsr] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Discuss on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

[John Scudder <[e-mail]>]

Thanks, Zahed.

Les and all, for clarity: please propose a revision, and then Zahed will take a look at it and sign off or raise any remaining concerns.

—John

On Apr 5, 2024, at 9:15 AM, Zaheduzzaman Sarker <[e-mail]> wrote:



Hi John,

That might work, given that the content of the section also reflects the intention clearly and matches with the section title change. I can have a look if there is any proposed changes.

//Zahed

On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 3:00 PM John Scudder <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
Hi Les,

On Apr 5, 2024, at 12:17 AM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:

John – I am not entirely clear on what would address your comment. Would replacing “algorithm” with “approach” in Section 6.3.2 be satisfactory?

I think so, with the exception of “there is no requirement or intent to standardize an algorithm” which would remain as written. But this is really Zahed’s question to answer. Zahed?, does s/algorithm/approach/g in Section 6.3.2 (including section title) work for you, or do you have another suggestion?

Thanks,

—John