Re: [Lsr] Second Working Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo

[Peter Psenak <[e-mail]>]

Hi Shraddha,

On 05/07/2021 06:44, Shraddha Hegde wrote:
> I support progressing this draft.
> 
> I have a minor comment on the Flags sub-TLV.
> 
> In section “ISIS Flexible Algorithm Definition Flags Sub-TLV”
> 
> And  “OSPF Flexible Algorithm Definition Flags Sub-TLV”
> 
> We should add an explicit statement that
> 
> “ If any undefined flag is set and that flag is not
> 
> Understood by the node it MUST stop participating in the flex-algorithm”
> 
> While this information can be derived from previous sections, adding an 
> explicit
> 
> Statement in the flags section will help implementors to honor that 
> statement.

will add that statement in the next version.

thanks,
Peter

> 
> If implementations miss this, it would be difficult to deploy features 
> that need new flags
> 
> In future.
> 
> Rgds
> 
> Shraddha
> 
> Juniper Business Use Only
> 
> *From:*Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <[e-mail]>
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 24, 2021 10:56 AM
> *To:* Acee Lindem (acee) <acee=[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
> *Cc:* [e-mail]; Christian Hopps <[e-mail]>; 
> [e-mail]
> *Subject:* RE: Second Working Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
> 
> *[External Email. Be cautious of content]*
> 
> I support progressing this document.
> 
> Flex-algo has already been demonstrated to be useful with a number of 
> implementations/deployments.
> 
>     Les
> 
> *From:*Lsr <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> *On 
> Behalf Of *Acee Lindem (acee)
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 16, 2021 7:01 AM
> *To:* [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
> *Cc:* [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>; Christian Hopps 
> <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>; 
> [e-mail] 
> <mailto:[e-mail]>
> *Subject:* [Lsr] Second Working Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
> 
> After the first successful WG last call, the authors discovered that 
> some re-work was needed for OSPF AS External route calculation – 
> specifically with respect to the Flex Algorithm ASBR metrics and 
> calculation. This was fixed and there were clarifications in the IANA 
> section (see versions -14 and -15). The draft has been stable since 
> April and we are now ready to WG last call the updated version.
> 
> Without further ado, this begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending on July 
> 1st, 2021, for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo/ 
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!S24A0VDoKfWQMUhBAT1294ruoAud7W0REDqMrKLfBu7v843mcXzJ6Eu7x3QAu8ny$>
> 
> All authors, please indicate by sending an email to the list, whether 
> you aware of any other IPR beyond what is already posted:
> 
>    [From 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo 
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!S24A0VDoKfWQMUhBAT1294ruoAud7W0REDqMrKLfBu7v843mcXzJ6Eu7x8TVfDmS$>]
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3910/ 
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3910/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!S24A0VDoKfWQMUhBAT1294ruoAud7W0REDqMrKLfBu7v843mcXzJ6Eu7xwIee-xG$>
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3248/ 
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3248/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!S24A0VDoKfWQMUhBAT1294ruoAud7W0REDqMrKLfBu7v843mcXzJ6Eu7xyrFkBLf$>
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Chris & Acee.
>