Re: [Lsr] Second Working Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo

["Acee Lindem (acee)" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Peter, 

On 7/5/21, 4:05 AM, "Peter Psenak" <ppsenak=[e-mail]> wrote:

    Hi Shraddha,

    On 05/07/2021 06:44, Shraddha Hegde wrote:
    > I support progressing this draft.
    > 
    > I have a minor comment on the Flags sub-TLV.
    > 
    > In section “ISIS Flexible Algorithm Definition Flags Sub-TLV”
    > 
    > And  “OSPF Flexible Algorithm Definition Flags Sub-TLV”
    > 
    > We should add an explicit statement that
    > 
    > “ If any undefined flag is set and that flag is not
    > 
    > Understood by the node it MUST stop participating in the flex-algorithm”
    > 
    > While this information can be derived from previous sections, adding an 
    > explicit
    > 
    > Statement in the flags section will help implementors to honor that 
    > statement.

    will add that statement in the next version.

We will request publication on this version. 

Thanks,
Acee

    thanks,
    Peter

    > 
    > If implementations miss this, it would be difficult to deploy features 
    > that need new flags
    > 
    > In future.
    > 
    > Rgds
    > 
    > Shraddha
    > 
    > Juniper Business Use Only
    > 
    > *From:*Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <[e-mail]>
    > *Sent:* Thursday, June 24, 2021 10:56 AM
    > *To:* Acee Lindem (acee) <acee=[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
    > *Cc:* [e-mail]; Christian Hopps <[e-mail]>; 
    > [e-mail]
    > *Subject:* RE: Second Working Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
    > 
    > *[External Email. Be cautious of content]*
    > 
    > I support progressing this document.
    > 
    > Flex-algo has already been demonstrated to be useful with a number of 
    > implementations/deployments.
    > 
    >     Les
    > 
    > *From:*Lsr <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> *On 
    > Behalf Of *Acee Lindem (acee)
    > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 16, 2021 7:01 AM
    > *To:* [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
    > *Cc:* [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>; Christian Hopps 
    > <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>; 
    > [e-mail] 
    > <mailto:[e-mail]>
    > *Subject:* [Lsr] Second Working Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
    > 
    > After the first successful WG last call, the authors discovered that 
    > some re-work was needed for OSPF AS External route calculation – 
    > specifically with respect to the Flex Algorithm ASBR metrics and 
    > calculation. This was fixed and there were clarifications in the IANA 
    > section (see versions -14 and -15). The draft has been stable since 
    > April and we are now ready to WG last call the updated version.
    > 
    > Without further ado, this begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending on July 
    > 1st, 2021, for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
    > 
    > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo/ 
    > <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!S24A0VDoKfWQMUhBAT1294ruoAud7W0REDqMrKLfBu7v843mcXzJ6Eu7x3QAu8ny$>
    > 
    > All authors, please indicate by sending an email to the list, whether 
    > you aware of any other IPR beyond what is already posted:
    > 
    >    [From 
    > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo 
    > <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!S24A0VDoKfWQMUhBAT1294ruoAud7W0REDqMrKLfBu7v843mcXzJ6Eu7x8TVfDmS$>]
    > 
    > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3910/ 
    > <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3910/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!S24A0VDoKfWQMUhBAT1294ruoAud7W0REDqMrKLfBu7v843mcXzJ6Eu7xwIee-xG$>
    > 
    > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3248/ 
    > <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3248/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!S24A0VDoKfWQMUhBAT1294ruoAud7W0REDqMrKLfBu7v843mcXzJ6Eu7xyrFkBLf$>
    > 
    > Thanks,
    > 
    > Chris & Acee.
    >