Re: [Lsr] Second Working Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo

Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Mon, 05 July 2021 05:34 UTC

Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 451DC3A170F; Sun, 4 Jul 2021 22:34:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.987
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.987 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TYVvlgVgGFSc; Sun, 4 Jul 2021 22:34:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x631.google.com (mail-pl1-x631.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::631]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A83963A1709; Sun, 4 Jul 2021 22:34:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x631.google.com with SMTP id m15so4921641plx.7; Sun, 04 Jul 2021 22:34:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8ch7WouxI8p0Z67ErQwQmtmncnQo8Yido+7PVo0ei+k=; b=trmv99gGJvyS3lkJc2LYsm4mM3cILievC2kZxhb3qlrxa1p8AMcilHzpcF8u+gCRGs z3JXY8atTtHGmJy3i8pY2hTRhbQkL0yhSOAYHVdHph1oXEH1j21g0ktNkba2BtcOY6a3 k2wvxuWdengBmvgcgxVpBU06lUb1TfsBPJ1eKIn7BZotsMPNcMkwXYl4qhVa6RFchN0K 5XI+aiAN3A5U0HZrDpYe65RSE3O5wCs43VX8lN7h2RDLgvqQq0nRFa82qn/uSxJvoMLi VCi0wQUWENwhOjGhqEMU5U5OR+LG+bbVPSMrWbgvEaxGFsS6rAr0Y/FvOTv1/UfTkIc/ zCBw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8ch7WouxI8p0Z67ErQwQmtmncnQo8Yido+7PVo0ei+k=; b=SC8JvSnZf8CSG4wUXGlpW/HZnQpYSBRHr6J5KFBjxISYlMH4Zc6kQfdEfzJULWjcVU +yDnRXYd6EX3zExGclj+bl0ZgmKNQYVj3aazHvVNjSDo8YonF0TjBNn2Zm8LOXTlQP8i NODmzzxGnlf8TuxlTFpfRb9VpkIFOIrD/6sDZZL8spivws7JSiZKbriO0pjxPwyfFI3y 8AV+NMngfDii4afdb82iqeo21yDTofb9XMPL/TYPoZVFX4F7rsSz0jMJTelGvOWwiN5h 3uWna7RbVkRW3gBY3yjMrowWnw6wxQD6/j30oETmKg8+bYCbps2gEksH5FuruyoOzncP x34Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533RjSnpSXHep+yi/aa0BQnqawmf9yXxR5QEZm66ePLKBTCG3z8d QkEs/PPXbN5eCCj17xFeSCGM9Z7JPXPtFkPpr58=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx5k4CZBOEX7QSyOlq1rW7P2d3OkjR1ZOg4k3bmu5/mWIbVpQSSW2ZqPVwwDextm7VQfTV8p/DRnksrTyhifvQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:4592:: with SMTP id v18mr13284032pjg.132.1625463244251; Sun, 04 Jul 2021 22:34:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <AFB5A092-6904-4E9A-8560-28258E092CB2@cisco.com> <MN2PR11MB43522F05BEC726665219A9AFC1079@MN2PR11MB4352.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CY4PR05MB35766B50277409820559BE55D51C9@CY4PR05MB3576.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CY4PR05MB35766B50277409820559BE55D51C9@CY4PR05MB3576.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2021 01:33:53 -0400
Message-ID: <CABNhwV1nrCmE_jYZppfaYGdS2sGSrFXPsRPFc4BAWhMLYxoxMg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Shraddha Hegde <shraddha=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>, "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>, "draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo.all@ietf.org>, "lsr-ads@ietf.org" <lsr-ads@ietf.org>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000044e49705c659a726"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/pI1Hck2gwbneqTTHhWIrcQz-vDw>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Second Working Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2021 05:34:12 -0000

I support publication of Flex Algo specification.

Flex Algo use with SR-TE policy provides added steering capabilities to SR
framework and is very useful tool to have in the operators toolbox.

Flex Algo has been implemented by multiple vendors as well as had
successfully deployed by operators.

Gyan
On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 12:45 AM Shraddha Hegde <shraddha=
40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> I support progressing this draft.
>
>
>
> I have a minor comment on the Flags sub-TLV.
>
> In section “ISIS Flexible Algorithm Definition Flags Sub-TLV”
>
> And  “OSPF Flexible Algorithm Definition Flags Sub-TLV”
>
>
>
> We should add an explicit statement that
>
>
>
> “ If any undefined flag is set and that flag is not
>
> Understood by the node it MUST stop participating in the flex-algorithm”
>
>
>
> While this information can be derived from previous sections, adding an
> explicit
>
> Statement in the flags section will help implementors to honor that
> statement.
>
> If implementations miss this, it would be difficult to deploy features
> that need new flags
>
> In future.
>
>
>
> Rgds
>
> Shraddha
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Juniper Business Use Only
>
> *From:* Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsberg@cisco.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 24, 2021 10:56 AM
> *To:* Acee Lindem (acee) <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>; lsr@ietf.org
> *Cc:* lsr-ads@ietf.org; Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>;
> draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo.all@ietf.org
> *Subject:* RE: Second Working Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
>
>
>
> *[External Email. Be cautious of content]*
>
>
>
> I support progressing this document.
>
> Flex-algo has already been demonstrated to be useful with a number of
> implementations/deployments.
>
>
>
>    Les
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Lsr <lsr-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Acee Lindem (acee)
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 16, 2021 7:01 AM
> *To:* lsr@ietf.org
> *Cc:* lsr-ads@ietf.org; Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>;
> draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo.all@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [Lsr] Second Working Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
>
>
>
> After the first successful WG last call, the authors discovered that some
> re-work was needed for OSPF AS External route calculation – specifically
> with respect to the Flex Algorithm ASBR metrics and calculation. This was
> fixed and there were clarifications in the IANA section (see versions -14
> and -15). The draft has been stable since April and we are now ready to WG
> last call the updated version.
>
>
>
>
>
> Without further ado, this begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending on July
> 1st, 2021, for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
>
>
>
>   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo/
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!S24A0VDoKfWQMUhBAT1294ruoAud7W0REDqMrKLfBu7v843mcXzJ6Eu7x3QAu8ny$>
>
>
>
> All authors, please indicate by sending an email to the list, whether you
> aware of any other IPR beyond what is already posted:
>
>
>
>   [From
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!S24A0VDoKfWQMUhBAT1294ruoAud7W0REDqMrKLfBu7v843mcXzJ6Eu7x8TVfDmS$>
> ]
>
>
>
>   https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3910/
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3910/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!S24A0VDoKfWQMUhBAT1294ruoAud7W0REDqMrKLfBu7v843mcXzJ6Eu7xwIee-xG$>
>
>   https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3248/
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3248/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!S24A0VDoKfWQMUhBAT1294ruoAud7W0REDqMrKLfBu7v843mcXzJ6Eu7xyrFkBLf$>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chris & Acee.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
>
-- 

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *

*Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>*



*M 301 502-1347*