[Lsr] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis-04: (with COMMENT)

Lars Eggert via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 25 May 2023 06:23 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietf.org
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CEA7C15107D; Wed, 24 May 2023 23:23:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Lars Eggert via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis@ietf.org, lsr-chairs@ietf.org, lsr@ietf.org, chopps@chopps.org, chopps@chopps.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 10.4.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-ID: <168499583523.19596.2166685638257782837@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 23:23:55 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/gAqgTNdXEExTmGqLkWbe9EQbQgM>
Subject: [Lsr] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 06:23:55 -0000

Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis-04: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

# GEN AD review of draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis-03

CC @larseggert

Thanks to Roni Even for the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) review
(https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/cC3DuuZVG_NAjLDNQMr_P5B14E8).

## Nits

All comments below are about very minor potential issues that you may choose to
address in some way - or ignore - as you see fit. Some were flagged by
automated tools (via https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool), so there
will likely be some false positives. There is no need to let me know what you
did with these suggestions.

### Grammar/style

#### Section 12.3.2, paragraph 1
```
ications. It is, however, RECOMMENDED to advertise all link attributes for RS
                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
The verb "RECOMMENDED" is used with the gerund form.

#### Section 14.1, paragraph 1
```
ch they MUST NOT be used. A new sub-section discussing the use of zero-lengt
                                ^^^^^^^^^^^
```
This word is normally spelled as one.

#### Section 16.1, paragraph 9
```
C 8920 included the following acknowledgements: Thanks to Chris Bowers for h
                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
Do not mix variants of the same word ("acknowledgement" and "acknowledgment")
within a single text.

## Notes

This review is in the ["IETF Comments" Markdown format][ICMF], You can use the
[`ietf-comments` tool][ICT] to automatically convert this review into
individual GitHub issues. Review generated by the [`ietf-reviewtool`][IRT].

[ICMF]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md
[ICT]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments
[IRT]: https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool