Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "IS-IS and OSPF Extension for Event Notification"
"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Wed, 13 October 2021 17:20 UTC
Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B32033A05E2 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 10:20:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.595
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.595 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=P4gxche2; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=fRJtTRI6
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b1qithVPfrkB for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 10:20:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D7CC3A05DE for <lsr@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 10:20:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=19735; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1634145649; x=1635355249; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=6ZKf9poNVJ16rL2VPeEN5PxOSfMRLwa2rTpLEacHvZ0=; b=P4gxche2hN7cp9amb9FtKUKqInpm9lfQN69Hzrxm1zvhKkXs8YUnItjJ 8ask0Zdu8jKklZyuJ0EVi9mfKaYltKlJu/aT+INBH7SdR9nen6YCSpDgZ HmB5e0Zi7GCwsad3mkmUFoFVCTsvohu4dNA1hv/8nQXBgBR1vUm/+Xr8u A=;
IronPort-PHdr: A9a23:lHFMrBWiNNNbFmKwpW0g6TnUyAPV8K3iAWYlg6HPw5pUe7+x4pekOkHDtr1hj17MCIPc7f8My+/bqLvpVmFI55Gd+GsDf5pBW15g640WkgUsDdTDBRj9K/jnPDYzB9ZfVxlj8m3oeURQEdz1MlvVpHD65DUOGxL5YAxyIOm9GoPbg8mtke6o/JiGaARTjz37arR3f32L
IronPort-Data: A9a23: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
IronPort-HdrOrdr: A9a23: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
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BzAAAcFWdh/5ldJa1aHAEBAQEBAQcBARIBAQQEAQGCBQcBAQsBgSAwKSgHd1o3MYRHg0cDhFlgiAsDlWiFCIEugSUDVAsBAQENAQEqAQwKBAEBhH4CF4IxAiU0CQ4BAgQBAQESAQEFAQEBAgEGBIERE4U7CCUNhkIBAQEBAgEBARALBh0BASwJAgEECwIBCBEDAQIBJwMCAgIlCxQJCAIEDgUbB4IESwGBflcDDiEBDqB4AYE6AoofeoExgQGCCAEBBgQEgUpBgn8YgjUDBoE6AYMDhBIBAYZzJxyCDYEUAScMEIFmgQE+gQUBgV0BAQIBgTRACQYHCYJiN4IuizdrblECTwgEaidOlVKIfo1OkisKgzCKRoZvjTgCAyynF4VSixiFHoxsk3YTCoRoAgQCBAUCDgEBBoFhO4FZcBU7KgGCPlEZD4E2jGoXIIM7hRSFSQF0AjYCBgEKAQEDCZFPgkYBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.85,371,1624320000"; d="scan'208,217";a="930956518"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 13 Oct 2021 17:20:22 +0000
Received: from mail.cisco.com (xbe-rcd-001.cisco.com [173.37.102.16]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 19DHKMq2014416 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 13 Oct 2021 17:20:22 GMT
Received: from xfe-aln-004.cisco.com (173.37.135.124) by xbe-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.792.15; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:20:22 -0500
Received: from xfe-aln-004.cisco.com (173.37.135.124) by xfe-aln-004.cisco.com (173.37.135.124) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.792.15; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:20:21 -0500
Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xfe-aln-004.cisco.com (173.37.135.124) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.792.15 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:20:21 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=DzjAoEoCIgmpd5a8guyzlLfKaEoGP/8uSRGQ/4Iaq5XG6rb7pHjP2IaYCf0Bbqq5kbY9L5hF6RHjAPqYNomCvWVa7WSOPUXx5mrUABQhsg45F0eDi+fQEmL23s7u+6OnePgeBfKDZ4YcM4cSAdp8iJkMkpb/xX0rDARcGSjFQYRA3GV9sRL4GnsQUenpXqrj5fGGX4E86N9ZYajiA+8+LwANKlFs+M69q81A3aACNUr61+2YUB2qhAN2LVQd6INo95YvfKWFV4CRAoCSqtSxfGs7lLwVlpk+jwZJZfpWeL+Yky2xY9Sdp9tjqnZR0zU+oM0LN0TbBqwPKveeyPvccA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=6ZKf9poNVJ16rL2VPeEN5PxOSfMRLwa2rTpLEacHvZ0=; b=LQsvuuBAqgcAtbTkb3STkFu4hXnyINCcCsbeNinz5+EqO8uiCoGrDFs/i7OXEGKHcCsaP46RugYJ//rQBjSGCxmEDtX1c81B8t9GyAVFnkDI39tILgHIj+nIzuBSmsUnlyauNFJXMA4vDWO1rQ5mDao8o3uqqI0r/LaxMSiXpSDSZmlIK1KAaOvKQtOqslHbZuPWSS/7F/DT2mA0/mwEJK5XQ5oLVxyDnDhjqS9K5BLyZrxwOhI3njWK/Rjx7AZfd8qYxCnRNlCM+1+S572X9SrKm4utZNRTgebmS4YLkQjOzOdEY3awDCxKq6QqP2sFK6cNMllGiR0xhWm/rkaCVQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=6ZKf9poNVJ16rL2VPeEN5PxOSfMRLwa2rTpLEacHvZ0=; b=fRJtTRI6P/VqQ8IfVfMAf9UvDxeVxr7u67A+IQBM3uNcjEzwNrZOoVPXeo5dKzp+21wT4Nr09zA2RdsNmtxgL78CiGICbgJwVWU3Ux0wo/+GW5Z8Yp39TvmUsdt0/8lZccF7Wmo5dOJyZIY3bweDEdHA9Byax4CeMo8XoTvmCiM=
Received: from BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:89::27) by SJ0PR11MB4895.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:2de::23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4587.24; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 17:20:20 +0000
Received: from BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d504:4942:c96d:eee8]) by BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d504:4942:c96d:eee8%7]) with mapi id 15.20.4587.026; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 17:20:20 +0000
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
CC: "Peter Psenak (ppsenak)" <ppsenak@cisco.com>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "IS-IS and OSPF Extension for Event Notification"
Thread-Index: AQHXv5wnVpelS/FiGUiAEbJv2zozR6vQnTeAgABE2oCAAEqlgP//vjSA
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 17:20:20 +0000
Message-ID: <29311602-8842-4A00-B43B-51E8C23D3386@cisco.com>
References: <D6E074A1-83B2-453A-B022-6CD5DEF3A4DF@cisco.com> <62cab867-cbc3-33f0-a021-2dff31619935@cisco.com> <DEEC557D-23A7-4279-9BCA-524A1FCDAAB4@cisco.com> <CAOj+MMFedNRbWWyi3mWeqUjX=Q588qG8i7FsAy98dXLnr2ypfQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMFedNRbWWyi3mWeqUjX=Q588qG8i7FsAy98dXLnr2ypfQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.54.21101001
authentication-results: raszuk.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;raszuk.net; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 5c2d51ce-ebb7-410f-8d84-08d98e6dbbdb
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SJ0PR11MB4895:
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <SJ0PR11MB4895ED8BBD37D4CEB27B4187C2B79@SJ0PR11MB4895.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-relay: 0
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(366004)(64756008)(2616005)(66446008)(76116006)(66556008)(66476007)(66946007)(86362001)(33656002)(166002)(966005)(83380400001)(4326008)(6916009)(91956017)(508600001)(2906002)(71200400001)(15650500001)(122000001)(36756003)(186003)(38070700005)(53546011)(8936002)(38100700002)(6486002)(26005)(316002)(8676002)(6506007)(5660300002)(54906003)(6512007)(45980500001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-chunkcount: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-0: 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
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2931160288424A00B43B51E8C23D3386ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 5c2d51ce-ebb7-410f-8d84-08d98e6dbbdb
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 Oct 2021 17:20:20.2823 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: k7o69QVKJulUa7Ng62EBTbMsDG9fwmfU0xHSvlP4ef01yGcf1XkdRCTfs9Wx6mzz
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SJ0PR11MB4895
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.16, xbe-rcd-001.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/qrSh4eHyF5b83XvH019fwn8aJbU>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "IS-IS and OSPF Extension for Event Notification"
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 17:20:55 -0000
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Date: Wednesday, October 13, 2021 at 1:16 PM To: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com> Cc: "Peter Psenak (ppsenak)" <ppsenak@cisco.com>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "IS-IS and OSPF Extension for Event Notification" > How many other PEs does a BGP edge PE maximally peer with? Typically on IBGP side you will see 2-4 peers. Those are RRs. Due to no autodiscovery of BGP sessions no many people do iBGP full mesh between PEs. Then in this case, how many PE next-hops in an IBGP domain? I guess the RR scenario is where we are BFD limited… Thanks, Acee Best, R. On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 6:48 PM Acee Lindem (acee) <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote: Hi Peter, See inline. On 10/13/21, 4:42 AM, "Peter Psenak" <ppsenak=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote: Hi Acee, On 12/10/2021 21:05, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > Speaking as WG Chairs: > > The authors of “Prefix Unreachable Announcement” have requested an > adoption. The crux of the draft is to signal unreachability of a prefix > across OSPF or IS-IS areas when area summarization is employed and > prefix is summarised. We also have “IS-IS and OSPF Extension for Event > Notification” which can be used to address the same use case. The drafts > take radically different approaches to the problem and the authors of > both drafts do not wish to converge on the other draft’s method so it is > understandable that merging the drafts really isn’t an option. just for the record, I offered authors of "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" co-authorship on "Event notification" draft, arguing the the event base solution addresses their use case in a more elegant and scalable way. They decided to push their idea regardless. One solution to this problem would have definitely been better. > Before an adoption call for either draft, I’d like to ask the WG: > > 1. Is this a problem that needs to be solved in the IGPs? The use case > offered in both drafts is signaling unreachability of a BGP peer. > Could this better solved with a different mechanism (e.g., BFD) > rather than flooding this negative reachability information across > the entire IGP domain? we have looked at the various options. None of the existing ones would fit the large scale deployment with summarization in place. Using BFD end to end to track reachability between PEs simply does not scale. It seems to me that scaling of BFD should be "roughly" proportional to BGP session scaling but I seem to be in the minority. My opinion is based on SDWAN tunnel scaling, where BFD is used implicitly in our solution. How many other PEs does a BGP edge PE maximally peer with? Thanks, Acee Some people believe this should be solved by BGP, but it is important to realize that while the problem statement at the moment is primarily targeted for egress PE reachability loss detection for BGP, the mechanism proposed is generic enough and can be used to track the peer reachablity loss for other cases (e.g GRE endpoint, etc) that do not involve BGP. We went even further and explored the option to use completely out of band mechanism that do not involve any existing protocols. Simply, the advantage of using IGP is that it follows the existing MPLS model, where the endpoint reachability is provided by IGPs. Operators are familiar with IGPs and know how to operate them. On top of the above, IGP event notification can find other use cases in the future, the mechanism defined in draft is generic enough. > 2. Assuming we do want to take on negative advertisement in the IGP, > what are the technical merits and/or detriments of the two approaches? we have listed some requirements at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-event-notification-00#section-3 From my perspective the solution should be optimal in terms of amount of data and state that needs to be maintained, ideally separated from the traditional LS data. I also believe that having a generic mechanism to distribute events has it own merits. thanks, Peter > > We’ll reserve any further discussion to “WG member” comments on the two > approaches. > > Thanks, > Acee and Chris > _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org<mailto:Lsr@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
- [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "IS-I… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Aijun Wang
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Aijun Wang
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Aijun Wang
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Wanghaibo (Rainsword)
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Tony Li
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Aijun Wang
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Tony Li
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Tony Li
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Aijun Wang
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Aijun Wang
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Christian Hopps
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Aijun Wang
- [Lsr] how not to distribute an e-mail Re: "Prefix… tom petch
- Re: [Lsr] how not to distribute an e-mail Re: "Pr… Christian Hopps
- Re: [Lsr] how not to distribute an e-mail Re: "Pr… Aijun Wang
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsr] how not to distribute an e-mail Re: "Pr… tom petch
- Re: [Lsr] how not to distribute an e-mail Re: "Pr… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [Lsr] how not to distribute an e-mail Re: "Pr… tom petch
- Re: [Lsr] how not to distribute an e-mail Re: Pre… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Enke Chen
- Re: [Lsr] Prefix Unreachable Announcement and IS-… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] Prefix Unreachable Announcement and IS-… Enke Chen
- Re: [Lsr] Prefix Unreachable Announcement and IS-… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] Prefix Unreachable Announcement and IS-… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Enke Chen
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Enke Chen
- Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "… Gyan Mishra