Re: [Lsr] 答复: LSR Working Group Adoption Call for "Hierarchical IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Thu, 15 August 2019 13:01 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E5EB120074 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 06:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=TIOHDpkB; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=jzt94iIP
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jXWZ1nsvpL0A for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 06:01:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8906F120046 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 06:01:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=13051; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1565874097; x=1567083697; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=qOJAlS9srfhubbWpLw2lu2Uv1P4Ym2eTYC8M+ujprwI=; b=TIOHDpkBRMEvIHi6OyFb69ugv8XuWFJ3xEZQHeG9lWCdC9A/7CPxpVSu MrST8Bhd3J56saTV57+8y4EnmU2B3NGvIB26L8k9yhhzzeva8hACCxy9a QxsqmVKI8uRgiIyvK9RBl7JOwJhZUAMq1uAx9fX+sM37eQGiX4/p9BuQf M=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3AgIT5YBVU6ZbnGW/lf5UVqfYmtYbV8LGuZFwc94?= =?us-ascii?q?YnhrRSc6+q45XlOgnF6O5wiEPSANiJ8OpK3uzRta2oGXcN55qMqjgjSNRNTF?= =?us-ascii?q?dEwd4TgxRmBceEDUPhK/u/Zic3EexJVURu+DewNk0GUMs=3D?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0B7AADqVlVd/5RdJa1lHAEBAQQBAQc?= =?us-ascii?q?EAQGBUwcBAQsBgRUvUANtVSAECyqEH4NHA4RShiVMgg+TCYRagS6BJANUCQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQwBAS0CAQGEPwIXgnwjNAkOAgQBAQQBAQEEAQYEbYUnDIVKAQMDEgsGHQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BMgYRAQYCEQMBAiQEAwIEMBQGAwoEARIigwABgR1NAx0BAo4RkGECgTiIYHO?= =?us-ascii?q?BMoJ6AQEFhQcYghQJgTQBi2gXgX+BECgfgh4uPoRkBhCCVTKCJowfgnWFDok?= =?us-ascii?q?Bji4JAoIdkXyCNxuCMIcwjl6DLm6JO5gEAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFQOIFYcBU7KgG?= =?us-ascii?q?CQYJCOBuDH4pTcoEpjgABAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,389,1559520000"; d="scan'208,217";a="307129771"
Received: from rcdn-core-12.cisco.com ([173.37.93.148]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 15 Aug 2019 13:01:34 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-012.cisco.com (xch-aln-012.cisco.com [173.36.7.22]) by rcdn-core-12.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x7FD1YeU006193 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 15 Aug 2019 13:01:34 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) by XCH-ALN-012.cisco.com (173.36.7.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 08:01:34 -0500
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 08:01:33 -0500
Received: from NAM01-BN3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 08:01:33 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=TY7wQQlZMTr4o9PMcoOGi0tryq2lCc1mmD8MYrb0+rUEAIwptcTwES48Yqm/ixlV67wlWtIcBXOTVAFcW+PMJJ2YIjv9TquFnkBeFE2P9I71BdLDn2a83iE8XPlckdzLVJCBVx2dy/6U7K1JNGr+/J90t5GX10sPj4Zpo9iwxy4ZJE98gREAJFPb7vGV2CusfMt3Y1zcQqBx6lT0uOZBDf4hs45OJNPyXgZpl1RsakhPhlXzwnEY5C3Mu/lv65EwALk6Q0PHLp+8+pPyapWfiTQ8zXutDnHl4ivyrsxLzlelrg/P4PuUTbbZXa28jFTadF5cQL8YBF8QFuNxaLx3WA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=qOJAlS9srfhubbWpLw2lu2Uv1P4Ym2eTYC8M+ujprwI=; b=DxCfYYBFjQXZgSApE+vJZM5hLDTrfsGRy/P326gRw3q5sbEvYFAG4TnG63WPSe5jYLnpAl6kf3NSJL7MUc5IFQGfjGwfuV3GpZQdQGJlNRM+QA45UljitROpnS2v3xMXbQETRv81v9cfzXnouBEXQJpX9R4QDYxG5l5SdyoI4IeCSz/23mPPkxMDus5WDqh+K2z5XKC+FBT16TQG6aGcJ35usvM32XqYSIT+jlkJuDtuFCT1f658JJ5zyrZjtC30pvnEdT55klBB0fCagglhWIyIuRv3OdlOYmG3rwHX/w7at16VAyH0FWRlGClU0UC3lrHEmDP1qsl6hjkcVS9XYQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1;spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com;dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com;arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=qOJAlS9srfhubbWpLw2lu2Uv1P4Ym2eTYC8M+ujprwI=; b=jzt94iIPiTu0C5y9py0uUnNKquyphi9B1Gzalf4KHZSQ9jxTozsrYQsEpm1NvIqK6YhvyPqdphhxF1HpnXzDCp6N5K1tZLaRxLu2yo3jXkHCgNltY7bya81wsAFPtWU5gd68vEiSMdJ128MBCENlJrh/Egu5KOSiKUbgaVyVMBs=
Received: from MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.38.14) by MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.250.159) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2136.16; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 13:01:32 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::859c:f271:3be2:74e0]) by MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::859c:f271:3be2:74e0%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2157.022; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 13:01:32 +0000
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: =?utf-8?B?562U5aSNOiBbTHNyXSBMU1IgV29ya2luZyBHcm91cCBBZG9wdGlvbiBDYWxs?= =?utf-8?B?IGZvciAiSGllcmFyY2hpY2FsIElTLUlTIiAtIGRyYWZ0LWxpLWxzci1pc2lz?= =?utf-8?Q?-hierarchical-isis-01?=
Thread-Index: AQHVU2mPakHnso4QGkWvntJgG/1/Aw==
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 13:01:31 +0000
Message-ID: <221704DC-8BA6-4B2D-8D40-16CE52054243@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=acee@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c4:1007::93]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: ac25c30a-014b-49a1-14e0-08d72180b1fa
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:MN2PR11MB3565;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB3565:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 2
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB3565066DA08EA97E4458C9CFC2AC0@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 01304918F3
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(979002)(4636009)(366004)(376002)(39860400002)(346002)(136003)(396003)(189003)(199004)(71200400001)(8936002)(64756008)(66556008)(66476007)(2501003)(66946007)(66446008)(76116006)(224303003)(6486002)(110136005)(86362001)(71190400001)(81156014)(81166006)(5660300002)(2906002)(33656002)(256004)(229853002)(102836004)(7736002)(6506007)(53546011)(478600001)(36756003)(14454004)(6246003)(6306002)(486006)(6512007)(316002)(54896002)(186003)(6116002)(46003)(6436002)(53936002)(99286004)(25786009)(476003)(2616005)(969003)(989001)(999001)(1009001)(1019001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB3565; H:MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: sgBIsFdd8EPFIG6i/ZhOo22CSZyJ5bklosoe7Z6LupEEifFFn+esLFvsBDo5H7daUsp8YOttMb01u5uzZumpLBeI6NO11Xi+6ncgkjMCO9mCFtCjfltUAIYFhnGyPBkMDuPrCmGbe7+0RWyh2t67SolApgLxsaaYsrE8ct9s9Q3cyaUUUqB2v52bsimlxytletnj6XbKVxmFVohts9LL5jaO9fExeDIyuPRUL+wlj2XhV5EoCMdlFDe0zyyXPOqy1W/JtYvfrK0eb+Yx6e2HKReBZP8ZeTZJ68T4lkQjbMalSTRr3QJkPwbanBDYBOymqSIZexBjWjsgBQGjdd6gbDTcxHE3UmWXJhjlRJ5eO8VtcerSRDuzkRkiGjjCS+lMieddbBeITY6IDyQJ61vd4YF3k5wT4J8bbv4jgKkD0Ik=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_221704DC8BA64B2D8D4016CE52054243ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: ac25c30a-014b-49a1-14e0-08d72180b1fa
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 15 Aug 2019 13:01:32.0022 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: jJk8my5kES7fmWsGw9LQgOpUHQtNxPEKMbN0NZtbeXXjBp9pMnmgdBzI0QoJCTfH
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB3565
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.22, xch-aln-012.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-12.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/sh__f-nENEme3vfLLjhRNswg5gQ>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] =?utf-8?b?562U5aSNOiAgTFNSIFdvcmtpbmcgR3JvdXAgQWRvcHRpb24g?= =?utf-8?q?Call_for_=22Hierarchical_IS-IS=22_-_draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchi?= =?utf-8?q?cal-isis-01?=
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 13:01:40 -0000

Speaking as LSR WG Member:

Hi Aijun,
I agree that most deployments will not move to greater than two levels given that we’ve gone this many decades with two and the predominant underlay deployment is one level. However, there appears to be sufficient interest and couple with good technical work on the specification to move to the next stage and adopt this as a working group document.
Thanks,
Acee

From: Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
Date: Thursday, August 15, 2019 at 3:11 AM
To: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>om>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Subject: 答复: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Call for "Hierarchical IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01

Some comments on this draft:
1. The size of network is increasing, but it is becoming more flat. Is it the right direction to make the network more hierarchical?
2. More hierarchical network means the traffic will also be traversed in hierarchical way, is it more efficient?
3. Is there any other methods to scale out the IS-IS deployment?


Best Regards.

Aijun Wang
China Telecom

发件人: lsr-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:lsr-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Acee Lindem (acee)
发送时间: 2019年8月12日 22:33
收件人: lsr@ietf.org
主题: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Call for "Hierarchical IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01

This begins a two week LSR Working Group Adoption Poll for the "Hierarchical IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01. The poll will end at 12:00 AM UTC on August 27th, 2019. Please indicate your support of objection on this list prior to the end of the adoption poll.

Thanks,
Acee