IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ltru] Status of RFC 4645bis

"Doug Ewell" <dewell@adelphia.net> Sun, 04 February 2007 00:31 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HDVHo-0004XI-1u; Sat, 03 Feb 2007 19:31:16 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HDVHn-0004X8-4w for ltru@ietf.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2007 19:31:15 -0500
Received: from mta9.adelphia.net ([68.168.78.199]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HDVHj-0004uT-Sd for ltru@ietf.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2007 19:31:15 -0500
Received: from DGBP7M81 ([76.167.184.182]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20070204003109.ERHG18698.mta9.adelphia.net@DGBP7M81> for <ltru@ietf.org>; Sat, 3 Feb 2007 19:31:09 -0500
Message-ID: <007501c747f3$c30db930$6801a8c0@DGBP7M81>
From: Doug Ewell <dewell@adelphia.net>
To: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2007 16:31:07 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="utf-8"; reply-type="original"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 856eb5f76e7a34990d1d457d8e8e5b7f
Subject: [Ltru] Status of RFC 4645bis
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

Since posting draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-02, the only comments I've 
received about the draft or its proposed contents (other than the hex 
NCRs, which are an RFC 4646bis issue) were from Debbie, who mentioned 
some minor wording changes that I'm waiting for specifics on.

Does this mean everyone loves the draft and feels it's about ready to 
go?  The ISO 639-3 folks have been updating their data files in response 
to the issues I raised, and apparently the standard is ready to be 
published, possibly by the end of this month, so I'd like to prepare a 
draft-03 that would be ready for WG Last Call.  Please send any 
comments.

--
Doug Ewell  *  Fullerton, California, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages


_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email